.NET framework has been discontinued for years now with .NET platform being the official successor. It’s no longer called .NET core. If one started with framework, moving over to platform is very easy as it’s the exact same language. If thet were on framework still, it would mean they haven’t updated in years, which would be weird and not recommended.
- 0 Posts
- 64 Comments
It makes no sense, .NET is fully supported on Linux and has been for years. There is an official SDK and it’s capable of creating full standalone executables, or smaller ones requiring the runtime libraries to be installed on the target system. As far as I know good packages exist for just about any distro. .NET is fully open source and not just worked on by Microsoft, but a large community.
Creating a Linux executable from any .NET code is as simple as running a single command, it supports cross platform compilation as well. With support for a range of architectures and OSes.
The only caveat is all the code needs to be properly managed code, any unmanaged code is most likely not cross platform compatible and is thus not recommended. It can even break as drivers or the OS is updated for example, so it’s a bad idea to have unmanaged code and usually not needed.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works•MikroTik RouterOS flaw lets attackers run code as root | CybernewsEnglish
2·24 days agoI know, the articles just annoy me. I use a lot of Mikrotik stuff and it’s great. Then you get these MILLIONS OF USERS VULNERABLE!!! bullshit stories and it pisses me off.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works•MikroTik RouterOS flaw lets attackers run code as root | CybernewsEnglish
4·24 days agoYeah no, the same was said about the previous vulnerability in the SSH server. News stories just assume when people run an unpatched version they are vulnerable from attacks from the internet and run with those numbers. It makes for a better story, but it isn’t the whole truth. OOTB these kinds of things aren’t exposed to the outside world and exposing them isn’t trivial.
People should still patch and these vulnerabilities aren’t a good thing obviously, but the news stories have been pretty sensational for something that probably won’t impact a lot of users.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Just a little update: effed by the archaic Geforce GT 220 somehow 😅
2·1 month agoSounds like an excellent idea! If you ever get tired of swapping, an USB capture card is a lot cheaper than a new GPU with current prices. Good luck!
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Just a little update: effed by the archaic Geforce GT 220 somehow 😅
2·1 month agoThat’s tight fit. If you really need the two capture cards then that’s the room you’ve got to work with. If you can bring it down to just one card at the top that would be a lot better. I personally use a capture card that’s connected using USB3, which works very well and doesn’t require room inside the computer (even though I would have room).
Most videocards have two or three fans on the bottom these days, with such a tight fit one of the fans can easily collide with the capture card. And even when it doesn’t it will have a hard time sucking in air from there. You can try and find a blower type card, but that would be a bit harder to find.
And you wouldn’t happen to have a GPU inside the CPU? Because the iGPUs from AMD are very solid if you don’t need much in terms of performance (easily faster than the 1030 you mentioned). Otherwise two capture cards and a GPU is a big ask in such a small case.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Just a little update: effed by the archaic Geforce GT 220 somehow 😅
2·1 month agoThe A series is pretty limited, I would go for a B series if you can find it. But keep in mind drivers for Intel on Windows are terrible and on Linux even worse. So that would not be a good time.
There’s plenty of cards that would fit in 40mm, but your airflow would be pretty bad. Do you have a pic of the inside of your system? There has to be a way to make something more fit.
But most 6600, 7600 and 9060 cards should be able to fit in 40mm. And with AMD the drivers on Linux are very good.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Just a little update: effed by the archaic Geforce GT 220 somehow 😅
2·1 month agoLook for second hand stuff and something like a 6000 series from AMD. Don’t buy cheap videocards new, they always suck.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Just a little update: effed by the archaic Geforce GT 220 somehow 😅
4·1 month agoOof, that’s a terrible card. The GP108 chip is a rebatched mobile card Geforce MX 150, it’s a pretty ancient chip at this point. There are no drivers for it, so you’ll need to use older drivers or limited open source drivers. Unless you got it very very cheap that’s not going to work very well for you. It’s newer than a GT 220, but not by much.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Just a little update: effed by the archaic Geforce GT 220 somehow 😅
2·1 month agoI think the one I have is 41mm, so that would be a tight fit. Can’t you rearrange the cards a bit to make some room? With only 40mm that would be hard to fit in any modern card.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Just a little update: effed by the archaic Geforce GT 220 somehow 😅
2·1 month agoYeah I have a RX 7600. It wasn’t brand new, but lightly used, bought it off a friend who upgraded. Paid around $200 for it, so I think a pretty good deal with current pricing.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Just a little update: effed by the archaic Geforce GT 220 somehow 😅
11·1 month agoYeah get a simple but recent AMD card, older cards, especially nVidia are a nightmare. I had an old 980 TI which was a really good card still, but I couldn’t use it anymore because everything kept breaking. So I got me a recent AMD card and it has been running perfectly.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•reason enough to fail the interview
51·2 months agoReminds me of the first time I saw Sin and Cos lookup tables being used in early 3D gaming. The computers could calculate those just fine, especially with a math co-processor. But for 3D gaming it would be too slow to get a good framerate. So lookup tables were used to greatly improve the speed.
Back on those days all sort of neat tricks like that would be used. Often done as little demo programs that were very impressive. Before the internet it was hard to look up something like that and the latest and greatest tricks weren’t written in books yet. So often little code snippets and demo programs would be shared amongst programmers using the sneakernet, so we could all learn and get better.
Good news: The feature you want has been a part of KDE since forever. Cursors are fully customizable with different cursor packs being available. Installing a cursor pack is very simple, just look through the different packs, select the one you want and click install. There’s so many different kinds available, one is probably to your liking. And if it isn’t you can probably find an artist easily enough and commission your own set.
Last time I had it not boot after an update has been years ago, it just works these days.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Seriously, every time I gotta be out the door. Just let me shut you down.
4·3 months agoThanks, I usually know what it is tho. Most often it’s VMs I was using for testing stuff, which I forgot to shutdown. It takes a while for them to cleanly shutdown, which is what the wait is for. I have a shortcut on my desktop to a script that checks for any running VMs still and shuts them down. But I forget to click it sometimes and then I have to wait. No big deal, except I like to switch off the power bar that powers the computer and everything attached to it. An old habit from when such a thing mattered, these days standby power is probably nothing to worry about. But still I wait patiently for the computer to shut down till I switch off the power strip.
Thorry@feddit.orgto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Seriously, every time I gotta be out the door. Just let me shut you down.
211·3 months agoWell you say that, but I’ve seen the countdown go past and then reset to a higher number often.
Did you read the last commit on the source? It would have told you exactly what you needed to know instead of wasting all of our time. It’s called common courtesy…
I was anti GUI for years. Having learnt to program on a tiny green and black 40x24 CRT on my old MSX back in the 80s. I remember being made fun of by fellow students and co workers alike for doing almost everything in the terminal. This included huge projects with complex file trees and lots of files.
But as time went on, I started to appreciate the GUI more and more. And these days I’m all for using a GUI for a lot of things.
Especially in IDEs that can do a lot of things with short keyboard shortcuts. I now have multiple monitors, including a large 32" primary. I always have stacks upon stacks of windows open and manage them efficiently. There’s always at least a couple of terminals hanging out and of course most IDEs also have terminal windows baked in. But all of the extra visual tools help me out a lot.
The whole productivity boost is such a non-argument. A lot of that code was written by people who don’t know what they are doing, so without the tool they wouldn’t have written any code at all. For the people that do know what they are doing, it helps them shit out code faster. But is that actually a gain in productivity? It would only be the case if the quality remains the same, which in most cases it doesn’t. And if the sloperator took the time to read and understand the code, even review it perhaps, the time gains would evaporate. But we all know good sloperators don’t read or think, they ship! And then there’s the additional workload for the people that have to actually review all of that code the AI pooped out. Especially with complex code this can be very hard and with the increased amount of code submitted, their workload has grown. If we take that extra (harder) work into account, AI is actually making us as a whole less productive.
If the gains were as significant as the slop glazers claim, the results would speak for themselves. In reality we aren’t sure, people THINK they are faster, they might ship shit out faster, but at expense of quality or extra work for others. Software as a whole would be transformed and we would all be in awe, in reality we see a bunch of shitty slop projects on Github, shit out and forgotten within a month. We see more issues than ever before, users are complaining about how bad everything is. Best case scenario you get something that kinda sorta works, good enough, while looking and feeling like icky slop.
It’s been years now, where are the results?