ElCanut@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · il y a 2 ansAsking the real questionsjlai.luexternal-linkmessage-square212linkfedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.15Karrow-down1external-linkAsking the real questionsjlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · il y a 2 ansmessage-square212linkfedilink
minus-squareSaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up65·edit-2il y a 2 ansNo, cause “John\nDoe” messes up my regex. Sorry, out of the question. I’m not good with regex.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·il y a 2 ansThen who’s coming up with all the bits that I copy/paste off the internet? The regex dragon?
minus-squareWhelks_chance@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·il y a 2 ansFrom what I’ve seen, it’s Cthulhu.
minus-squarenucleative@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·il y a 2 ansThere was only one, we’re all still copying from him or her.
minus-squarelseif@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·il y a 2 ansthey likely aren’t good regex’s ;P … anything with more than, say, 6 operators is probably missing an edge case or will be outdated in a year (and then it’s impossible to determine its original intention)
No, cause “John\nDoe” messes up my regex. Sorry, out of the question. I’m not good with regex.
no one is “good” with regex.
Then who’s coming up with all the bits that I copy/paste off the internet? The regex dragon?
From what I’ve seen, it’s Cthulhu.
There was only one, we’re all still copying from him or her.
they likely aren’t good regex’s ;P … anything with more than, say, 6 operators is probably missing an edge case or will be outdated in a year (and then it’s impossible to determine its original intention)