cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoNo Connection, No Flushlemmy.mlimagemessage-square330linkfedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1imageNo Connection, No Flushlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square330linkfedilink
minus-squarerekabis@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoWill have to look into that, thanks. One of my key implementation requirements, however, will be resiliency, which means simplicity will be a core feature. The more “moving parts”, the easier it will be to break.
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt’s not easy to make it any simpler. You’ve got to control those devices somehow.
Will have to look into that, thanks.
One of my key implementation requirements, however, will be resiliency, which means simplicity will be a core feature. The more “moving parts”, the easier it will be to break.
It’s not easy to make it any simpler. You’ve got to control those devices somehow.