There is a request for a comment on this issue Controversial posts and comments #2515. Do you have any ideas on how best to implement this?

I’d like to see some more people chime in with opinions, but maybe that’ll come with a PR. At the very least, it’s something that can be moved forward with.

— dcormier

  • doylio@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My first thought is to rank items by totalVotes / score. This would prioritize posts that get lots of votes in both directions.

    Example:

    def getControversialScore(upvotes, downvotes):
      return (upvotes + downvotes) / abs(upvotes - downvotes)
    
    getControversialScore(50, 10) # 1.5
    getControversialScore(4, 5) # 9
    getControversialScore(6, 30) # 1.44
    getControversialScore(30, 28) # 29
    
    • l3mming@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I like this. Super clean and simple.

      That said, I suspect Reddit’s ‘controversial’ sorting might work a little differently, as I often used it to see what the crazy people were saying.

      I haven’t played with the numbers, but I’m not sure that your proposal would push the crazies to the top - just the moderate crazies.

    • Modal@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It might depend on the definition but I’d probably expect engagement/total to play a bigger factor.

      As it is it weights very heavily towards evenness:
      A: (11, 10) = 21
      B: (99, 90) = 21

      They have the same ratio of votes but I’d expect B to be more controversial since more votes are tied up in the controversy / it got more attention. Maybe most people just don’t care about A so they didn’t bother to vote.