ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoInheritancelemmy.curiana.netimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down15
arrow-up11.29Karrow-down1imageInheritancelemmy.curiana.netExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square34linkfedilink
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·1 year agoI didn’t think COBOL had inheritance.
minus-squarezqwzzle@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up48·1 year agoHence the roundabout route I guess. Programmers really should stop using it. https://xkcd.com/583/
minus-squarebitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoFor some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year ago For some reason It’s because “every language must do OOP”. Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.
I didn’t think COBOL had inheritance.
Hence the roundabout route I guess. Programmers really should stop using it. https://xkcd.com/583/
Carlos!
For some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
It’s because “every language must do OOP”.
Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.