afk_strats@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoInspired by a Lemmy postlemmy.worldimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1828arrow-down17
arrow-up1821arrow-down1imageInspired by a Lemmy postlemmy.worldafk_strats@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squareSapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoFront loading bays though. Most 3.5 inch drives go in top loading bays. Do they looking like modern 3.5inch drives, or older ones?
minus-squareDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThere are a number of chassis that have front loading 3.5" bays. I have one at home. Looking at the pic, each chassis looks to be 3U. I’d bet money those are 3.5".
minus-squareSapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoWhat I meant, is that they are not commonly used anymore, because of how expensive rackspace and power has become in commercial settings.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI’d have to see the connection ports… IDE, SATA, and SCSI drives all look the same unless it’s one of the 5 inch drives that afaik only ever were SCSI.
Front loading bays though. Most 3.5 inch drives go in top loading bays. Do they looking like modern 3.5inch drives, or older ones?
There are a number of chassis that have front loading 3.5" bays. I have one at home.
Looking at the pic, each chassis looks to be 3U. I’d bet money those are 3.5".
What I meant, is that they are not commonly used anymore, because of how expensive rackspace and power has become in commercial settings.
I’d have to see the connection ports… IDE, SATA, and SCSI drives all look the same unless it’s one of the 5 inch drives that afaik only ever were SCSI.