mudkip@lemdro.id to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoI wasted all my generational luck for thisfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down16
arrow-up1409arrow-down1imageI wasted all my generational luck for thisfiles.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-squareafk_strats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up38·1 year agoIf this is reproducible without chicanery, I’m terrified
minus-squareNot_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoWithout chicanery? Yes Without luck? No
minus-squareafk_strats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·edit-21 year agoI think this is beyond luck. This is astronomical. It’s orders of magnitude beyond what is lucky for our entire civilization to have produced in its entire existence
minus-squareProgrammingSocks@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoI’d put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that’s so lucky it functionally should never happen.
minus-squareCookieOfFortune@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoAgreed. Most likely a bad implementation. For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random.
If this is reproducible without chicanery, I’m terrified
Without chicanery? Yes
Without luck? No
I think this is beyond luck. This is astronomical. It’s orders of magnitude beyond what is lucky for our entire civilization to have produced in its entire existence
I’d put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that’s so lucky it functionally should never happen.
Agreed. Most likely a bad implementation.
For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random.