The root partition ID is in the grub configuration, it’s mounted when the system boots. Then fstab is read and the other partitions are mounted.

fstab is needed for root mount options and other partitions, but as you saw with your system if the only partitions other than root are not needed to boot your system will boot fine (I don’t know which options grub uses when mounting root though)

The Piped kodi addon sometimes works, but it’s been so rare I found myself downloading videos and streaming them to Kodi over DLNA most of the time… Not perfect but it works

That’s what I like about OpenWrt, every update wipes everything but what’s explicitly configured. And the first update that doesn’t break anything is a rela satisfaction, meaning your whole configuration is contained in a few files listed somewhere

The web is a frightening place these days.

A few seconds after I stood up a public web server, there were bots scanning for .git and .env.

Mauricio Teixeira (Mastodon)

I got my 20th crowdsec alert (for a banned IP) for today while reading that… I don’t know what’s happening but this week is not a good one

proudly displaying its name

I prefer that over hiding the fact they used a LLM. At least I know what to expect when I see that.

Looks promising! And it’s refreshing to see something that doesn’t look vibecoded in a week. Couldn’t find any AGENTS.md or other AI crap so I could actually try it

cargo() {
  cargo $@
  echo So how you doin\' today?
}

Fixed

boost::msm errors enter the room

https://xkcd.com/1205/

Login with your mom lmao

tmpfs? If so this is in RAM. You can check with mount -l

Especially concerning illegal downloading

Then you can just revoke the device key, can’t you?

I think Fedora is a reliable choice, and if you don’t like gnome or plasma any distro will let you install anything else so it’s doesn’t really matter.

Thank you very much, do you have recommendations on lists to subscribe to?

Nice! Will try that tomorrow! I just noticed you misspelled the name on the readme: NavidSpot

deleted by creator

I think you’re confusing backup and redundancy. While I totally agree RAID1+ should not be considered backup, it absolutely is redundancy, as the same data is present on at least two disks (either on the form of the exact same data or something that can be used to rebuild the missing data).

RAID0 has no redundancy, all other levels have (either mirroring or with parity)