I found this guide on how to make an inpainting model out of any model. Though it’s pretty out of date.
Yeah, this seems like the last confirmation we didn’t really need.
What are his feelings on open source? That’s my question.
If you’re using the same UI and metadata, you should be able to reproduce images with only slight differences and then upscale them with hires fix or something else.
Doesn’t seem like it.
That’s kind of unbelievable given what they say it can do.
They said they would be open sourcing it.
That was really cool.
Those might just be LoRA merged models, not full fine-tuning. From what I heard, fine-tuning doesn’t work because the models are distilled. You’d have to find a way to undistill them to train them.
Last I heard, LoRAs cause catastrophic forgetting in the model, and full fine-tuning doesn’t really work.
I don’t think so. They’re going to have to do a lot better than a tutorial to win people back. That said, the two Flux models being distilled making them close to impossible to fine-tune sucks too.
The way you described is already how Civitai works. Maybe it’s to keep the moderation of the two sites cleanly separated. This way the team on green can do what ever they want, on green.
Yeah, I didn’t notice the login since I was signed in.
Oh, that makes sense.
I don’t really know myself. I assumed it would install and update stuff for you.
Strange people would downvote because of the title. I couldn’t have called that.
That’s all I know. I don’t really use the models and I don’t know any specifics.
Pony is like an extreme fine-tune of SDXL. It’s the way it’s trained makes it incompatible with regular SDXL LoRA and Controlnets so it gets a different classification.
If training goes well, it looks like we might get to see what AuraFlow is capable of. I’m not a fan of the Super Artists. It’s such a letdown and hindrance for pushing aesthetics forward.
It’s only decipherable to people who have kept up with the last two years of IMG Gen jargon.