• 4 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • I disagree (a bit at least).

    Debian is just as prone to breaking due to the lack of fallbacks (e.g. Snapper), it just doesn’t break as often because it doesn’t change as much as Arch.
    If you use a minimal/ default install, this won’t happen as easily, but as soon as you customise anything, you get problems.
    Arch can be reliable too, there are many people who have had the same install for years without breaking.

    I would actually recommend Fedora Atomic or other image based distros, e.g. VanillaOS.
    They can be more modern, while being way more reliable thanks to atomic updates/ transactions, complete image rollbacks and the reproducibility.
    They are a dream to use imo!


  • You can still install Nix (package manager) on Atomic, on uBlue, it even comes pre-installed afaik.

    And also, there’s Distrobox, which is totally enough if you prefer package managers over Flatpaks.
    I personally like the “reliance” on Flatpaks. I think it reduces the fragmentation and makes it easier for devs, but that’s just my opinion. Do as you prefer.


  • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldhell yeah mint
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t like apt too as much. But, interface-wise, you can make it way better with Nala, which is a frontend for it.

    NixOS is too complicated and demanding for most users, who aren’t programmers or hobbyists, imo.
    I prefer Fedora Atomic. It has the same pros (unbreakable, highly configurable with universal-blue.org, etc.) but feels way more user friendly.
    I use it with Distrobox on top, so I can use my package manager/ distro of choice (turned out to be Arch btw) on a extremely reliable system.

    For your case, you can replicate Mint by just installing the Cinnamon image from uBlue and applying some minimal tweaks.
    Then you get the user friendliness from Mint with the flexibility and unbreakability from NixOS. Do you like the idea? Just in case you get annoyed by NixOS in the future 🙃




  • Debian is community run, which often means all changes and features get implemented because the community wants that, not some corporation. One notable example of that is Snap.

    Also, I found (minimal install) Debian a bit more minimalist than Ubuntu server, which is great imo. I just want the bare minimum for my services to work, and pretty much the only thing I expect from my server to have is SSH and Docker.





  • My recommendation would be to use Logseq.

    It’s similar to Obsidian (“Second Brain”/ PKM), but with the journal function as backbone.

    It relies heavily on crosslinking, is markdown-based, very efficient and a joy to use once you “got” it, and supports a hell lot of features, including TODO, plugins, a knowledge network (“graph view”) and much more.

    I use it for everything (external brain) and pretty much never loved a piece of software this much!
    It sounds like it is THE tool you’re searching for!



  • Because containers (Distrobox, Flatpak, etc.) are bae.
    You can read my post I made a while ago for more information: https://feddit.de/post/8234416

    Once you “get” image based distros, you probably never want to go back. Traditional distros just feel… off now for me.
    Containerisation is the biggest strength in Linux, we use it all the time on servers, so why not on the desktop?
    Atomic OSs just make more sense for me, not only because of security/ bug/ whatever reasons, no, also because they feel simpler and are pretty convenient and robust.









  • There’s a big shift happening right now, you’re right on that.
    Traditionally, ARM is not as capable in solving complex issues, but more efficient.

    That’s why it has always been used on smartphones for example. You want a lot of battery and don’t need to do highly complex stuff on that, that’s what you have your PC for.

    The big focus in the last years has always been to top the competitor in terms of performance, and only right now, people begin to question if the computing power they have right now isn’t enough and if they rather wouldn’t like to have a device that’s more efficient.
    The tradeoff is, you’re more limited to this specific architecture. Apple solved this by making a compatibility layer for x86 apps, but that of course comes with a performance hit.

    I’m no expert in that topic tho, so take all I said with a lil grain of salt.

    Right now, I think you’re better off with x86, because your server will definitely run on some sort of Linux, and we don’t have any compatibility layer or something like that yet.


  • I think 4 a year is better than 3. With 4, you can just do a quarterly thread, which is easier.


    I think the concept of megathreads could be executed a bit better. In the way it is suggested in the post, it’s only a poll about preferences and popular choices we all use anyway.

    I’m thinking about the idea to make a weekly category collection, where we can discuss specific things in more detail.
    E.g. “[Weekly thread] What browser do you use? (07/2024)”, where we can debate why one prefers Mull over Fennec, what problems we had with Vanadium, and so on.
    Or, what niche apps we found this month.
    Or, what FOSS app exceeds it’s proprietary counterpart.
    And so on, and so on. I can give you 20 topic suggestions in less than 2 minutes 😅

    This would generate much more engagement and value imo.

    And then, we can just simply link each weekly discussion in the quarterly mega thread with one bottom line each.
    In that way, everyone would have more resources to read further into, and it’s more organized.
    Also, this would prevent routine. We don’t need a “Which gallery app do you use, and why is it simple gallery?” every time. We can come up with many new ideas each week, and then, every megathread is different and still worth reading into a few years from now.


    Getting more than one vote is simple, too simple. It should be linked with why you think that way and use that tool.
    Lemmy is a discussion site, not one for popular opinions and polls. I think engagement is the highest priority, both for strengthening the community, and for the SEO to rank Lemmy higher than Reddit some time in the future 🙃

    And linking it to upvotes is bad, that’s not the purpose of them. We can still upvote suggestions we disagree with, but that are argued good and add value.


    Tittle Im thinking: [Megathread] FOSS Apps — Lemmy Edition | You like? Or do you want another?

    Not recognizable enough imo. It will go under in less than a year. What about
    [Megathread] Summary of your favourite FOSS Android apps | Community picks for Q3-2024!
    ?


    Feel free to discuss!


  • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.detoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldRPi Alternatives for Self-hosting
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Where I live, electricity is also very expensive. I monitor every watt.

    I asked the same question half a year ago, here’s what I’ve learnt: RPis tend to be less reliable and aren’t that energy efficient. They’re great for small appliances, but for servers (e.g. NAS) not as much.

    Get an used Thinclient/ mini PC. They cost something between 50-150€ and give you a huge performance boost, more ports, a x86 architecture, are better repairable (still often bad) and more.

    Mine uses about 10-15 W on normal use, and 20 rarely when my cloud is under heavy use.