and Windows 10 is obviously so outdated it’s not even worth including
and Windows 10 is obviously so outdated it’s not even worth including
4th row 3rd icon
They should add it in C++26
I think Excel formulas also use this, but it’s been a long time so I might be misremembering.
Yes, you’ve got it right. <> means ≠. 16 is not equal to 6.
What languages use this? I don’t like it!
On the other hand it goes well with >= and <=. If >= means “either > or =” then <> means “either < or >”, it checks out.
But I still don’t like it.
are the legs not allowed to be detached even for a moment for maintenance?
While I agree that it’s awfully low nowadays, kudos to them if they know that’s all they need.
Huh? With IPv6 you get your own IP address, the ISP doesn’t need to know shit about ports. Your address is not behind a NAT anymore, and ports don’t need to be forwarded.
Perhaps you mean the ISP set up a firewall that blocks incoming connections? In which case, maybe you can have that firewall disabled? ISP firewalls and “safe browsing” packages are always shit.
To be honest though there might be some aspect to this I don’t know.
they’re running 10 screens in parallel
To be fair, it turns out not all environments implement floating-point arithmetic by the IEEE spec, meaning division by 0 can produce different results depending on where you run it. So in C++ float division by zero is undefined: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42926763/the-behaviour-of-floating-point-division-by-zero
But I’m fairly sure (note: based on literally no research) that most environments today will behave like the IEEE spec.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero#Floating-point_arithmetic
In IEEE arithmetic, division of 0/0 or ∞/∞ results in NaN, but otherwise division always produces a well-defined result. Dividing any non-zero number by positive zero (+0) results in an infinity of the same sign as the dividend. Dividing any non-zero number by negative zero (−0) results in an infinity of the opposite sign as the dividend. This definition preserves the sign of the result in case of arithmetic underflow.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero#Floating-point_arithmetic
In IEEE arithmetic, division of 0/0 or ∞/∞ results in NaN, but otherwise division always produces a well-defined result. Dividing any non-zero number by positive zero (+0) results in an infinity of the same sign as the dividend. Dividing any non-zero number by negative zero (−0) results in an infinity of the opposite sign as the dividend. This definition preserves the sign of the result in case of arithmetic underflow.
AFAIK that should give you +infinity, not NaN
The process that’s used to kill, or in short, the ‘kill process’.
(though I like the other answer better)
You’re in the majority in general society though, IMO. And I’m with you as well.
This just makes it more realistic
I had to turn my phone sideways and go cross-eyed to spot the difference.
Have you ever actually seen someone care about that particular choice of terminology, without being sarcastic trying to be funny?
My guess: it’s a mouthful and not catchy. “Linux” is short, catchy and easy to pronounce. With “GNU/Linux” I don’t even know if I’m supposed to spell out the GNU or pronounce it as a word, and I don’t know if I’m supposed to say the “/” as “slash” or “plus” or “and” or if it should actually just be silent. I like to type how I speak, so if I don’t know how to say it I’m not going to write it, and I’m not going to like reading it.
I can totally see the merits for “GNU/Linux” but don’t underestimate the importance of catchiness. Maybe if it were shortened to “Ginux” it could stand a better chance, but then we’d have another gif situation.