I think the key word there is consent. And the other important topic is distribution.

Would you consent to having your picture taken naked is different to someone taking a picture without you knowing or them asking for consent. If you wanted the picture of you naked and the person wanted to take a picture of you naked, both sides consented. But then how it is distributed is another matter. You can still not have the consent a person would need to distribute the picture. This is why it’s becoming illegal in more and more countries to show a naked picture to someone you took with your phone even if that person consented to have the picture taken that does not mean they consent to you to distribute it acting on behalf as their agent. In cases where this has happened the person poses or sends the picture to one person they want to have it. That isn’t agency to distribute it or/and make money off of it.

A person taking a shit in public or changing with the door open are both examples of giving consent to be publicly seen if you’re deciding to do the act however the witnesses to it are not giving consent to have it in their space to be forced to see it. But then should one of the witnesses have a cel phone and film you shitting or changing in public, this also falls into the you-didn’t-consent to how it’s distributed.

The whole privacy issue is it is done entirely without one person giving consent to have their information distributed. Even if you did consent to give that person some personal information, they then decide without your consent to act as your agent about your personal information in how it’s distributed.

What in the ‘towels-on-mirrors’ did I just read?

Ask them about their bank, all their passwords, the contact information of everyone they ever loved, ya know, in case you ever need to use that information against them or without their consent,

keep going till they are properly creeped out and as upset as they should be at anyone but them knowing that information.

Do YOU have anything to hide??

“Yea my bank information, passwords, personal identity, identity of all my loved ones. But hey, if you hate having security and love being blackmailed and hate everyone who you have ever made contact in your life and wish to make their life hell then you do you and stay far the fuck away from me. We don’t know each other and we never will”

because someone wrote it with self-righteousness

Usually a call sign of someone who hasn’t been really entrenched with bad code to understand their foolishness in comparison.

I’ve only seen people hold that idea if :

1. New and amateurish, I give them a chance cuz they might learn. But let them learn.
2. Someone who’s only ever worked in maybe two places for very long lengths of time, given way too much power too early, people threw around ‘genius’ too eagerly and these people guard their code like a watch dog likely because it’s so fragile a simple ‘()’ in a string will bust everything . No one else can work on it and the only way you can fix it is the moment they leave. They will not learn. You can only hope the eye of Sauron will stop looking in your direction.

I’ve known influential assholes who poopood commentating as if it’s only a superficial job.

I hate those people.

I’ve known people who do this several times in a year. One even came back to his old job, just to leave it within months to go to a new one, brag about how much better it is. He moved on from that job too within a year.

Might just be the entire industry has reached enshittification in more than one way.

Maybe you should get a life if a someone else’s personal choice for elected gender role pisses you off this bad.

Cool….circa 1990 game graphics. How quaint.

There’s an app called “whatever”? Is it the new WhatsApp? Or an app about being indifferent?

I don’t for someone who scams someone else and thinks they can apply the exact scenario to the person on the line.

This isn’t a scenario where someone outran a slower person to let a tiger eat them.

They brought the tiger TO THEM full well knowing they are too slow to run.

You are all over this thread harassing people.

I’m allowed to engage in a forum where I talk to other people other than just you. You are not my world and I don’t need your approval.

‘Harass’ said the person who’s obsessed with me… I think you are personalizing this a lot.

I don’t care about your opinion.

Then why are you here talking to me about my opinion ?

Don’t talk about crap you don’t understand.

You aren’t my boss in life. But this is easily fixed with the block button so this is a choice that you made. I didn’t force it on you to either read it or not.

Watch the myriad of YouTube channels that cover the scam industry in India. Some people have their family and lives literally threaten with death to pay debts working for scam call centers by literal gangsters.

welcome to poverty. This is what happens to people who can’t afford care too. Life is not fair to impoverished but that is NOT nor is it EVER an excuse to impose that on someone else.

That is sad.

Scamming someone else is not sad. It’s infuriating and it’s gross when you give it such an excuse as empathy to con or hurt others. They should own they harmed someone.

I’m not putting my hands in the fire for anyone.

Yet here you are.

But that is also the product of an exploitative capitalist mindset.

And here you are infighting instead of attacking the mindset.

None of the people actually making the phonecalls are “escaping poverty”.

Also you: “* Some people have their family and lives literally threaten with death to pay debts working for scam call centers by literal gangsters. *”

It’s the owners of the computers and offices and bank accounts that accrue the scam money who are getting rich. And those people rarely set foot in the actual call centers.

Yeah and if the person on the phone is no longer in debt and the person on the other side of the line is, they benefited. They are still a villain.

It’s not sad for a capitalist who uses the ‘I escaped poverty’ while sinking others into poverty to do it.

You absolutely should.

Scammers escaping poverty by putting a bunch of others into poverty is the very definition of a capitalist and cancer.

Eat the rich just as you would zap cancer.

So you’re buying that explanation that a scammer is escaping poverty by putting a bunch of someone else’s into poverty?

You just defined Bezos. Lol. You just got double scammed.

As much as a person could find a reason to feel sorry for them they unnecessarily verbally abuse people they are scamming and that was a choice they made. Their hands are not clean from playing a villain.

And escaping poverty by putting someone else in poverty …that’s the capitalist game. No ethics is part of the package. They are not victims.

Nope. you’re an unsympathetic “how nice for you” asshole talking over people who need to be heard to get the help they need. Don’t be that person.

You fuckers always act like having privacy online is impossible or something when it’s really not. All it comes down to is user tech literacy and knowing what do to.

And you elitist fuckers love to shame others when it should be made easier for users. Shame on you.

Well… at least she won’t be deepfaked. So there’s that.

Firefox is not safer. It’s just a different browser for people who don’t like to say ‘chrome’ in their mouths . It’s not really any different in the safety. It’s like how people think private browsing is private but it’s not. It’s just a comfort label.