It is true for raid 5 & 6. Raid 0, 1, and 10 are supposed to be production ready. I use raid 10 only with btrfs, anything else and I use zfs or mdadm.

My only gripe with btrfs is that I’ve had systems come down from a single drive failure in raid quite “often” when compared to other FS.

ZFS is a ram hog but I always could do a live resilvering without downtime.

Any evidence of that? Genuinely curious as I can’t really find anything about them being by the same people and forgefed started as mailed-based prior to forgejo existing.

edit: seems like they are funded by different organizations and the main contributors to forgefed never worked on forgejo, they worked on vervis though.

Just to give credit where credit is due, git federation is a Forgefed Initiative

Forgejo is implementing it in their platform.

One of the first interaction I witnessed from the forgejo guys was this PR:

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27455/

The interaction and stubbornness of earl-warren felt like it was just that, provoked drama.

I use owncloud infinite scale and overall its rock solid. The downside is the lack of plugins. Nextcloud has been nothing but trouble for me and every update was a mess so I decided to try OCIS and for my need I was extremely satisfied.

Now, I admit, I’m not one to get carried by the drama in the FOSS sphere (still use Gitea) but I do agree there is an history to the separation of owncloud and nextcloud that can make some people uncomfortable. Having a choice is good I believe.

tar -h

Edit: wtf… It’s actually tar -?. I’m so disappointed

deleted by creator

Edit: something that are not arm based

You want pre-built to run ollama, that’s at least gonna cost you an arm, maybe even a leg.

One of the most known programming tool is built on Ruby, Github.

I’ve been using hatch lately and being able to setup dependencies, packaging, ruff, and black all in a package.toml and not having to setup virtual environment is really nice. I’d recommend a try.

I’ll say that as someone who stopped using docker and went back to deploying from source in lxc containers: dockers is a great tool for the majority of people and that is exactly what it aims to be, easily reusable in as many different setups as possible.

On the flip side, yes it may happen that you would not benefit from docker for a reason or another. I don’t, in my case docker only adds another layer over my already containerized setup and many of the services I deploy are already built from source in a CI/CD workflow and deployed through ansible.

I do have other issues with docker but those are usually less with the tool and more with how some project use docker as a mean to replace proper deployment documentations.

The majority of maintainers stayed with Gitea. Forgejo is not the tip, they still pull the majority of their commit from gitea directly.

I pay 80$ for 1gb/750mb with bell. I could upgrade to 3/3 for 120$ but then they’d change my modem and the homehub 3000 was the last one I could remove the transceiver and plug fiber directly in my server opnsense router.

I hate you, congrats!

In Canada we have to give our firstborn to a telecommunication monopoly for somewhat OK internet.

I’d really like to see how Germans manage their college essays with minimum word count.

Btrfs also allows for mixed size drive. It’s the reason why I use it

Edit: autocorrect