If they weren’t using LLMs to code, I’d mostly agree with that. But projects that put effort into integrating LLMs likely use them as well (as is the case here).

How about one that doesn’t use LLMs to code?

Goddamnit. I hope someone forks 2.20.

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/

I really like having the disclosure comment pinned for a more nuanced explanation of what, if any, AI went into a project or post. I think just a tag can’t capture the levels of AI use.

I’m personally a never-genAI, but, unless we go No AI as a community, I don’t think it makes sense to group all projects that touch AI for documentation with all that use it for testing with all that completely let the AI generate all their code, etc. And I don’t think setting a threshold for which get tagged makes sense either. Basically, a tag is misleading no matter how it’s implemented.

Do they not want AI autocomplete in the IDE? AI-assisted translation? AI-generated test cases?

I would like no AI anything, yes.

/r/selfhosted has an automod comment that creates a place to disclose how genAI/LLMs were used in the project and the post. I like that.

Good. Burn it all down.

I like you.

They stole it fair and square (according to the lawyers, at least).

I am Groot.

Just FYI, Homepage has ping functionality to check if your services are up. siteMonitor

Apps that need to send emails or receive emails.

Love the lifetime deal. 10GB across any number of accounts. That’s what I’ve got.

I only use it for automations (both send and receive); I’m on Proton for regular mail. They’ve got a few different web interfaces, so I think you can get spouse approval. Not sure on local storage (outside of POP/IMAP).

I can highly recommend MXroute. Just works. Great for integrations.

Use DNS validation

I… don’t actually know. I wouldn’t think that would be necessary (at least manually).

It transfers across other peers; you don’t have to have a direct connection to the recipient, just an eventual connection to them.

Docker is your friend. :)