And if it’s not expected, it also eventually will be part of systemd.
- 0 Posts
- 197 Comments
Old man yells in SysVInit
The text in her bubble is obviously changed, but I do remember this strip.
Depends on your time zone. It would still be new years eve in the US.
I would have thought this is written by the marketing department of DynamoDB, MongoDB or CouchDB. Another column? 14 to 28 days.
IP addresses are like oil for the internet, therefore a legitimate military target.
It’s older than millenials, but widely known. And not really a “meme” like 420, 69 or 67. It was a chill meme.
“Joder tío” is more like “damn, dude”, or “aw, fuck” not “fuck yeah”
Spanish, Galician, Portuguese, Asturian, catalan, Valencian, Balearean and Andalusian. Fuck yeah… I mean… venga vamos!
Both yum and dnf are wrappers of rpm (the CLI tool, not the format)… Similar to apt and dpkg.
Ich benutze Arch, übrigens.
Of course data is kept consistent, that’s ACID.
Yeah, and not adapting accumulates the kind of tech debt that pays my bills when I have to come clean up. If everyone was doing their job I would be in a different like of work, a less profitable one for sure.
Mooooom, I’ve been hacked!
Exactly my point. Wrong technology. If your operation takes more than 1s and you just accept it, you are not very good at your job. No worries, more job security for me!
I would recommend reading a few books, but given that you couldn’t even read my first post about when to use transactions, it’s futile.
If your single operations take 80ms either it’s a toy app or someone didn’t do their job (unoptimized queries, wrong technology, wrong modeling, etc).
Again, not data integrity (Error correction) but consistency (aCid). Adding two milliseconds to a half a millisecond operation is by no means cheap…
“Pretty cheap” is very subjective…
As long as the database is acid restarts should not be a factor. Data integrity is not helped by transactions, you would need error correcting codes for that. Plus the effect on performance is quite notable on all dbs I’ve worked with.



That would be &&.
A single & will run them in parallel.