• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • It depends VERY much about the content and invitees of the meetings.

    If you’re there to give your expert engineering feedback, awesome. If you’re there to receive the information you need in order to provide expert engineering feedback, awesome.

    So often, I find, meetings are too broad and end up oversubscribed. Engineers are in a 2 hour meeting with 10 minutes of relevance.

    There are serious differences in meeting culture, with vast implications oh the amount of efficacy you can juice from the attendees.





  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    cake
    tolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldLinus does not fuck around
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This wasn’t abuse, though.

    It was a hash admonishment for the specific choices and actions that the person did that were wrong , and that the person, based on their position of authority should absolutely know to be wrong.

    The confluence of factors here are what differentiates this from abuse. By calling this abuse, you’re actually diminishing what actual abuse is.


  • I think you’ve missed what the sin was, as well as the context of the players.

    The sin was not the bad code. Let me say it one more time for clarity: the issue was not the code

    The issue was that, when presented with the defect (inevitable outcome of any software project: not intrinsically sinful) Mauro started blaming other people on a public mailing list

    Mauro, being a maintainer, was in a position of authority. Like a police officer, their bad behaviour reflected poorly on the organization*as a whole.

    If a cop was abusing their power (publicly or not), I expect the chief of police to come down on that abuser; to make clear that this abuse is absolutely unacceptable, not only within the accute instance, but within the greater context of the expectation of the behaviour of the whole organization.

    Mauro chose the context of his abusive behaviour as the public mailing list.

    Him getting slapped down in that same forum is the direct result of his own choices.

    In the same way that I would be upset with the chief of police not publicly and harshy denouncing an abusive police officer, so would I be upset with the absence of such a response in this situation


  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    cake
    tolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldLinus does not fuck around
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    After I saw the car hit the cyclist, I rushed to his aid.

    The driver came out of the car, yelling at the cyclist for being on the street.

    “Shut the fuck up. Get back in your car. You are the problem. It was wrong of you to hit him and wrong of you to blame him you fucking idiot. You can help, or you can fuck off, but you’re not going to stand here and blame the man you just injured with your own incompetence”, I screamed at the driver.

    I was the true villain in this scenario.


  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    cake
    tolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldLinus does not fuck around
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    I agree, it’s completely unacceptable to introduce a bug and then to instead of taking responsibility for introducing such a bug, you start pointing fingers at everybody else.

    It’s like when a car hits a cyclist following all the rules and then tries to blame the cyclist for not following some made up rules that only exist in the drivers head “Cyclists should be on the SIDEWALK if they don’t wanna get hit!”

    Not only were they wrong to hit them, they’re DOUBLE wrong for trying to blame them after the fact.