

The link doesn’t seem to point to any existing post. Did it get removed?


The link doesn’t seem to point to any existing post. Did it get removed?
“2027 edition”
Arch is pretty reliable


Thanks.
For how long do you plan on keeping the v3 API compatibility?
I hate GNOME not because it looks bad (though some parts do) but because of their ways of doing stuff. Best example imo is libadwaita and client side decorations.


what? what part of rust is ugly?
A bunch of clowns.
reminds me of a certain ai
we got rickrolled


Great! Welcome to the club


blazingly fast.


When the LLM realizes that it’s running through GNU Parallel, it improves its performance by what can only be explained as an emergent sense of respect for the Free Software Foundation.
???
edit: wait is this whole article a joke
I’ve tried several distros before, none of them feel the same as arch linux, I keep coming back to it. It is simple and just works. The other distros feel too bloated out of the box, which immediately demotivates me. I don’t want to go through the hassle of removing everything I don’t need by hand, so arch is just perfect.
Though I think I shouldn’t have went with arch in my vps. I miss the automated security updates of Fedora.
There is something called OpenWebAuth that is currently in use by Hubzilla.
There’s even a FEP for it: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/61cf/fep-61cf.md
Welp, I guess it needs some more development time.
Why not use something like Angelfish instead of Firefox?


I use Aegis on my phone.
eOS is based on aosp though.
It’s funny how many GNOME people whine about the title bar wasting so much space when GNOME apps literally look like as if they’ve been made for touchscreen users. Also, what about the great black bar on the top of the system?
We should honestly just leave GNOME behind and have them deal with it. We won’t move forward much with their child-like stubbornness and toxic community.