• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • bitsplease@lemmy.mltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldUpdates
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    At the time I made the comment, it was literally just those downvote and not one up vote(except the one by the OP), hence my comment

    Its actually an interesting phenomenon I’ve noticed on reddit and now lemmy - if someone is getting down voted for something dumb like violating the circle jerk, if a child comment points it out, the downvote stop instantly and it starts being up voted 🤷🏼‍♂️


  • bitsplease@lemmy.mltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldUpdates
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m pretty sure the whole “iPhone as a status symbol” thing is a thing of the past - I literally can’t remember anytime in the last 5 years that anyone expressed envy at someone owning a iphone.

    I’d argue that yearly upgrades regardless of phone brand are more of the status symbol now



  • bitsplease@lemmy.mltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldUpdates
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    What exactly do people complain about Windows doing that Linux also does? Trying to be neutral here, but I can’t think of a single issue that is a common windows complaint that is also an issue on Linux. I can think of plenty of issues for both OS’s (and MacOS too fwiw), but the venn diagram of windows issues and Linux issues is just two non overlapping circles as far as I can tell lol


  • bitsplease@lemmy.mltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldUpdates
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    on this site at least - you’re absolutely right, and the fact that you’re getting bombed with downvotes is pretty solid anecdotal evidence of that if nothing else lol

    Don’t get me wrong, I get just as annoyed by those who insist Apple can do no wrong as those who insist they can do no right. I just find it weird how pseudo-religious people can get about Apple. It seems like you’re not allowed to just view them as another tech company. You have to either crusade against them, or else you’re a paid apple shill



  • bitsplease@lemmy.mltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldUpdates
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    They 100% did

    Don’t get me wrong, there’s plenty to gripe about with apple, just like every tech company, but I swear half the complaints I hear about Apple products on lemmy are either outdated or just plain wrong

    For some reason the anti-Apple circle jerk is supercharged on Lemmy. I’ll never understand why people get themselves so worked up over a brand they never have to do business with



  • what if you lack the fragments needed to reverse engineer/reconstruct a means to access the information?

    Well that’s a different question, because now it sounds like you’re assuming that significant data loss will occur before it’s read. If the storage unit itself is damaged in the meantime to where it’s data is corrupted beyond recovery, then yes - that’s a potential total loss scenario. Assuming however that the storage unit remains intact, I don’t see how a dedicated team of smart individuals couldn’t handle it, unless their technology is somehow inferior to ours.

    It’s also worth considering that this storage unit probably won’t be their very first interactions with modern data storage systems. This may or may not be their first interaction with a data storage system that was actually written from modern times, but unless we have a total technological collapse in the intervening 10,000 years, chances are they’ll have records from our time that have been copied over however many thousands of times to make it there. Afterall, to use a much less extreme example, I don’t need to get my hands on a CD-Rom or Floppy Disk burned in 1991 to get a copy of Linux 0.01, it’s been copied over and over through the years and is now available for download online. Data will surely degrade over time, and large chunks will get lost as people stop copying things they think are no longer important, but I feel pretty confident in the idea that enough pieces will make it that far that these scientists (techno-archeologists?) won’t be starting from scratch


  • “What if the future computer systems simply aren’t compatible with the old filesystems, thus indicating nothing as being present on the storage media (if it’s even recognized as storage media to test)?”

    We’ve reconstructed archaic languages that no living person speaks from fragments of written records, I find it unlikely that we’ll be completely unable to reverse engineer an ancient file system architecture - especially since the most likely course for someone actually reading one of these 1000’s of years in the future is for the reader to be from a more technologically advanced civilization.

    Think of what modern archeologists would give to have the equivalent of a wikipedia archive from 10,000 years ago - imagine the colossal amounts of grant funding that would be thrown at the problem if we even suspected such a thing was within reach.

    Of course all the other issues about keeping the actual system safe for 10k years are totally valid, but you have to start somewhere, and getting a data storage system that can last that long even in perfect conditions is the necessary first step.







  • Yeah the biggest practical use of the current generation of LLMs is online astroturphing and viral marketing. AIs aren’t reliable enough (yet) for things that require correctness, but they’re damn good at saying a thing you want said over and over in countless different ways.

    Customer service (aka customer support chat bots) will also try to make use of it, no doubt, but I’m skeptical about how much they’ll actually trust it for that. All it’ll take is one person figuring out how to make the Chipotle chat bot spout nazi propoganda or some shit before they go back to “dumb” chat bots lol



  • bitsplease@lemmy.mltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldshhhh dont tell them :)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not “ready-to-go”, but the AUR does absolutely have GUI installers (Example) - the fact that it’s not pre-installed is by design, afterall if Arch came with a bunch of pre-installed optional tools, then it wouldn’t have most of the benefits (lightweight and minimal by default) that makes Arch worth choosing over other distros. I agree that having it pre-installed would make it more user-friendly, and I definetely wouldn’t argue that it’s the most user friendly distro out there by a mile. My point was simply that it’s now

    A) Easy to install

    B) Easy to find pretty much any package under the sun, in an easy to search and install medium

    C) Easy to find a solution to whatever problem you might be facing, or to find comprehensive instructions on the wiki of how to perform any operation.

    Side note

    especially for owners of Nvidia cards it will just work

    I’m not really sure what you mean by this, I have an nvidia card, and set up my system with proprietary drivers with absolutely no fuss. I know Arch used to have issues with nvidia cards, but I’m not aware of any ongoing problems.

    And yeah I’ve got nothing against Arch-Forks, I think they’re great for anyone who just wants something out of the box. I used Manjaro for years (but like you, left after one too many issues)