What method are you using to mount the nas for immich. I ran into issues trying to mount my Nas using docker volume+sshfs but ran into zero problems using docker volume/cifs. With sshfs, immich would run until it suddenly stopped working and backups would constantly fail. Restarting the server would cause it to run for a little time longer.
I think the issue might be that the config changes haven’t been properly committed. Docker container won’t just update based on docker compose config.
docker container stop
docker container rm
You might want to delete and reset any settings which have been set
docker volume ls
docker volume rm (IDs from docker volume ls)
(This will also wipe out any backups/accounts made on immich already tho)
But once you have deleted the old containers, running docker compose up -d will start the containers with the new config.
You can use docker compose logs -f to see the server logs and check if everything is working.
xD just blocked the spammer and all his comments disappeared. Imagine working so hard to spam and it takes 2s to for someone to hide your posts.
What does the addon do?
Ah! the classic “Turn it off and on again (but for real this time)”. Works every time.
xD true
deleted by creator
Can’t you just build from source of you want it? Like kde has pretty good docs for this.
Did you just … license a comment?
Okay this has made it so much worse. i figured that the s in https and ftps stands for secure like a reasonable person. of course it doesnt xD. you would think that this is at least consistent but alas. guess what s in ssh doesnt stand for :)
what! thats so dumb xD. so ftps stands for file transfer protocol secure, and sftp stands for ssh file transfer protocol? we have reached recursive acronyms.
Nemo/most file explorers have a remote server option. For nemo, “Files > Connect to server”. Once configured, you should be able to view your server files from your file explorer and uploading files should be as easy as drag and drop. I’m pretty sure nautilis has something similar too!
It’s not the best for security because if someone gets your computer, they can access your server through the file explorer. But it’s fast and convenient if you are already using your file explorer.
Might even say they ran like A55
Can someone explain to me why github apparently has bad UX/UI? I always thought the UI has gotten really good over the years.
[Edit] Like there this huge argument in these comments about the release button being all wrong. ??? No clue what people have against it. I thought it was fine? You can use it or not. People link to it if they want it more prominent. Someone explain?
[Edit 2] Also what’s up with the people who are vehemently against uploading bins to GitHub releases. This is literally what github is doing on their own repos. Not trying to say that anyone should feel obligated to release bins (CI/CD is a literal job title). People are releasing software for free because they want to. Let’s not look a gift horse in the mouth.
Idk I’m gonna stop reading this thread. its driving me crazy.
You essential have a compiler written through metaprogramming. For your implementation, did you use a find and replace or did you define and parse a grammar like a true compiler.
Oh metaprogramming! I’m doing a dissertation on this.
Nw! Today is your lucky 1 in 10,000 moment.
Thumbs are fingers and anyone who says otherwise is huffing blue paint
Never realised this was a controversial topic! xD
Ah yeah that should be good. I’ve never had issues with NFS