What’s wrong with it? Honestly it’s kinda refreshing.
- 1 Post
- 64 Comments
My favorite is seeking feedback on reviews on stuff we own and people not responding and being like “I’m sorry I had Claude create 500+ PRs I can’t possibly respond to everything”
You don’t think there’s a problem with that!?!?
And anytime they try to rectify people balk at the price increase and drop.
It’s not the critical lynchpin of work that they were hoping they could charge stupid money for.
sudo zypper dup
Oh no it’s a whole review…
My company is unironically rolling this out without any hint of why this could be a bad idea.
criss_cross@lemmy.worldto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Adopting Claude speak in regular life
15·3 months agoActually the dishes you are talking about aren’t dishes at all.
If you want I can go through options to replace these items with actual dishes.
“Here’s my Claude skill that takes the LLM 20 minutes with constant babying that saves a human 1 minute of work”
Promo time baby!
criss_cross@lemmy.worldto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•And just like that, the AI industry started caring about intellectual property
9·3 months agoMaybe next time don’t ship your source maps if you care so much?
criss_cross@lemmy.worldto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•A company worth $340bn, ladies and gentlemen
36·4 months agoLMAO 1 nine of reliability.
criss_cross@lemmy.worldto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•A company worth $340bn, ladies and gentlemen
201·4 months agoIt’s like all companies forgot that reliability is a core feature…
criss_cross@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•I prompt injected my CONTRIBUTING.md – 50% of PRs are botsEnglish
2·4 months agoIt’ll still catch the bots that randomly throw out that part of the prompt.
Prompts aren’t a guarantee.
criss_cross@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Gryt-Chat: Like Discord but Self HostedEnglish
5·4 months agoI don’t know if requiring an S3 bucket really fits the self-hosting ethos
criss_cross@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•An upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verification
9·5 months ago"(1) Provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store.
Sounds like it’s a text box that enter input into. Making it completely pointless.
criss_cross@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•An upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verification
22·5 months agoIn essence, while the bill doesn’t seem to require the most egregious forms of age verification (face scans or similar), it does require OS providers to collect age verification of some form at the account/user creation stage—and to be able to pass a segmented version of that information to outside developers upon request.
So you just fake a date and call it a day… thank you Cali…
For real though I can’t imagine the sysadmin and docker nightmares that arise from having to completely overhaul your account orchestration scripts to input a garbage birthday.
I don’t think anyone thought of the fact that an account on an OS doesn’t always correspond to a human.
Good to know.
I have not touched it in several years so I just remember the 2013-2019 onslaught of bootstrap.
Oh god I didn’t expect that to give me the level of PTSD flashback that it did.
Fuck bootstrap with a rusty pitchfork.
And 50% of the styles are marked as !important
I’m a millennial and I’m an energy drink guy.
Expensive. Do not recommend.

Clearly they don’t find it useful.