• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • Yes and the manual install taught me how to deal with DEs refusing to start without having to do a full reinstall.
    It’s such a pleasure to be able to save your setup no matter what the issue, apart from the time I accidentally erased my hard drive with a sudo rm -rf * command that was supposed to wipe a USB drive.



  • folaht@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlWhy?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    25 days ago

    Homework.

    College used linux because I did computer science.
    Topic: concurrency. College then gave us a programming assignment that required adding a code library, which I had never done before or even heard of, and thus did not understand.
    Since this was a library that was platform-specific, they had made one library for linux and one for windows.
    Way too late I got the gist of it but still couldn’t install the library.
    Since the question contained the linux directory structure I was convinced that the windows library was broken and every other college student finished this task in Linux.
    Thus I installed Linux.
    Ten years later I understood and finished the assignment.


  • I went from Sailfish, to Ubuntu phone, back to Sailfish,
    then bought a Pinephone due to the war,
    not knowing if the Finnish company would survive
    before going back to Sailfish.

    Pinephone, despite it being the most linux of phones, used up too much battery power.
    Ubuntu phones were already miles better.



  • Have had both. Still have Sailfish because the phone is cheaper.
    Also I thought Ubuntu Touch would be discontinued and I no longer use Ubuntu on my desktop,
    but an Arch-based OS.
    Best thing you can do is buy a phone that’s most compatible to the OS.

    So Fairphone 5 or Pixel 3a for Ubuntu Touch,
    and Jolla 2 for the Sailfish.

    Do not buy Pine64.
    Pine64 is unusable.



  • It seems that RHEL has been based on Fedora for over twenty years now 😅.

    I only used Fedora in college on shared college computers and that was over twenty years ago.
    It was brand new back then as they switched over from Solaris.
    I was under the impression back then that Fedora was a Red Hat Linux derative like Ubuntu was of Debian,
    Ubuntu being the OS I was using at that time and the Linux Distro Timeline implies as such, however…

    perhaps it was based on RHEL once upon a time, but it hasn’t been for a long time. Regardless, documentation on this event seems to be relatively sparse. As such, I wasn’t able to arrive at a definitive conclusion. Please feel free to complete my ‘research’ 😜!

    Businesses weren’t too keen about Red Hat’s six month release cycle, as the short time interpolation was too disruptive for them.
    Red Hat then decided to have a seperate OS with a long-term support cycle and call that Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL).
    At the same time, users were demanding a ‘Red Hat Community Edition’, so Fedora came into existance and that was then used as an upstream source for RHEL.

    Sorry, I didn’t quite get this. Do you mean that *“container app”*s will not succeed in decentralizing efforts and instead have the opposite effect?

    Yes. It’ll make some OSes more pointless. People will try out the distro in the distrobox, get what they need out of it and not bother installing it
    or jump ship to the better one.

    Perhaps you misunderstood me, but to be clear: Distrobox is basically available on every distro out there.

    No, it’s clear.

    Hmm…, I don’t quite understand why you think like that. There’s a lot that goes into making distros unique and deserving of their existence. Strictly limiting their appeal to the size of their respective (user) repos is honestly a disservice to the grandiose effort put out by our respected F(L)OSS developers.

    It’s a defining feature for me.
    I had to jump off Ubuntu and Parabola for this reason.
    For Ubuntu I needed the latest version of some package and for Parabola it was certain packages that were non-free.
    Distrobox did not exist back then.

    NixOS sounds very interesting, but the moment I tried to install the distro- package manager I noticed aws packages and I have an aversion of anything remotely Amazon. Guix peaks my interest even more now that you’ve mentioned Distrobox.

    I think I’ll take the jump.


  • CachyOS has been installable (at least) as early as November of 2021. Its GitHub page is even older, going as far back as October of 2021. Bazzite, on the other hand, is at least a year younger as it dates back to December of 2022.

    Thank you for that info, but then why are so many advising Bazzite instead of CachyOS?
    CachyOS is Arch-based, Bazzite is not.

    Bazzite is based on Fedora Atomic. FYI, Fedora is not based on RHEL. Quite the opposite, actually, as Fedora is “upstream” of RHEL.

    And thank you for that info.
    So Red Hat decided to put Fedora in front and put RHEL in the back?
    Red Hat used to be the base OS of Fedora, no?

    Come out of your cave, fam. Distrobox has been out for years now. And, with it, everyone has access to every other repo (including the AUR). We’ve finally evolved.

    Again, thank you for that info.

    But I don’t think any container app would diversify distros or make Fedora distros more popular.
    In fact, it probably will lead to AUR-based distros becoming even more popular,
    because one will have access to all the other smaller repos,
    as AUR becomes the standard.


  • I think you’re better off with CachyOS than Bazzite to be honest.
    It’s Arch-based, comes with an installer with KDE Plasma as default and on top of that is optimized for performance and geared towards gaming.

    The only reason people are recommending Bazzite
    is because CachyOS is only a year old, while Bazzite is two years old,
    unless someone can prove me otherwise.
    In any case Bazzite is RHEL-based, so it won’t have the AUR or pacman,
    which are the two things that set Arch-based Operating Systems apart from the rest of the pack.
    AUR and pacman are superior to all other repositories and package managers.




  • Arch is better because…

    • pacman, seriously, I don’t hear enough of how great pacman is.
      Being able to search easily for files within a package is a godsend when some app refuses to work giving you an error message “lib_obscure.so.1 cannot be found”.
      I haven’t had such issues in a long time, but when I do, I don’t have to worry about doing a ten hour search, if I’m lucky, for where this obscure library file is supposed to be located and in what package it should be part of.
    • rolling release. Non-rolling Ubuntu half-year releases have broken my OS in the past around 33% of the time. And lots of apps in the past had essential updates I needed, but required me to wait 5 months for the OS to catch up.
    • AUR. Some apps can’t be found anywhere but AUR.
    • Their wiki is the best of all Linuxes

    The “cult” is mostly gushing over AUR.




  • Unity would be the first example, and although Unity was actually a good DE,
    it was too bloated and almost non-modifiable.

    People jumped ship to Linux Mint that had its priorities straight.

    Mir and Snap were bigger issues though
    as Wayland and Flatpak were great replacements for
    X11 and AppImage and did not need another competitor.

    But the privacy issues were the straw that broke the camel’s back.
    People left windows for linux so they wouldn’t have to deal with this kind of nonsense.

    I actually jumped when Ubuntu jumped to Gnome 3.
    Gnome 3 was too bloated for me and it looked ugly.

    I decided to see what Arch Linux was about
    and eventually settled for Manjaro Linux.
    Arch + Xfce for the win.