There’re only 3 types of people:

• Those who use NixOS
• Those who have skill issues with NixOS
• Those who don’t know NixOS yet

Only?!

Are we pretending 2 years old software is a good thing?

Nixos is the objectively correct choice if anything.

Stores the user’s birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26- 051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.

This is a poor wording

That law doesn’t require to verify the age of the user, it doesn’t have to, because it’s a law for parents.

What you’re saying is exactly slippery slope. You’re taking earlier examples of completely different laws, with different purposes and mechanisms, and you make your argument based on how the implementation of those laws worked.

Occam’s razor explanation of DMCA 1201: The law makers wanted to foolproof the law and implemented security measures that weren’t needed.

Also THE only argument you have for the fact thisaw is going to be changed is the law that changed (even if only temporarily) IN A GOOD DIRECTION!

You really made me laugh.

Who is pushing for this?

I want to know that too.

I know meta lobbied for app store accountability act or smth, I don’t remember it’s name. They didn’t do that to spy on people, but because they wanted to shift the blame.

This is a law FOR PARENTS.

It’s not a law for children, it doesn’t target to protect children from up, but to give parents the tools to set the age of the kids themselves.

Do you have any proof that those systems were created for control? You sure have if you express your opinions with such confidence.

But they did what the laws (Californian, Colorado’s and basically every other, except for the New York’s and Texan) required them to do.

Only penalty in this law is for OS makers that didn’t include such rules in the OS, paying per affected child.

Slippery slope again

Lawmakers don’t care whether you’re 18 or 56

Put NixOS below RHEL

Is this ragebait?

LMAO

From a non techical user perspective.

I used unmodified GNOME 40 and 49 for a week. There were few changes, I could absolutely see myself using the older version and not missing much.

In my opinion GNOME 4X is as good as linux DEs get. I would like to see some popular extensions getting official support and native dynamic tiling, but besides that it’s hard to see room for improvement.

Removing X11 is a big deal, but most users won’t see it as such.

How many people were using X11 on GNOME?

Yes, it’s technically a huge change, but regular user won’t see a difference

I must check it out, thanks

I don’t think they give it that information in system prompt and models don’t know who they are

Honestly, not much changed since GNOME 40.

Is it a bad thing? No

Do I want more changes? Also no

The only thing missing from GNOME for me is proper dynamic tiling. I’m trying Forge extension, but it feels clunky

I’m curious what model are they using. Some weak GPT? Gemini Flash Lite?

Both macOS and Windows are the same thing: Proprietary garbage