Doesn’t the ASL allow re-licensing derivative works?

Also… do you really think that if I’m into committing war crimes I care about a software license?

Also, it doesn’t help that they communicated it poorly making it sound worse than it actually is.

The Ask Noah podcast has an interview with Mike McGrath from RH and, besides trying to argument that it will now be illegal/impossible for downstream repackagers to just use RHEL’s source rpms, they say that the whole thing boils down to RH stop de-branding RHEL sources and feeding them back into the Centos git.

Personally, I guess they initially just decided to stop working for Oracle/Alma/Rocky for free (after all, there’s no reason for RH to do the RHEL de-branding anymore since they killed Centos) and then saw an opportunity to try and spin the story into “clones will now be worse than RHEL” and “clones are morally bad”.

The main thing I don’t know is whether that gives you the right to treat 2xx04’s repository as though it is MIT license

Of course it doesn’t (it doesn’t for GPL violations, either)

yq (“jq for yaml” written in go) seems like a cool project and the dev seemed like a nice (but busy) person when I implemented a feature for it. Maybe it could be a nice place to start.

Here’s my favourites:

Blob wars is a 2d platform/shooter that is great fun (great sound effects and hilariously excessive gore).

Warzone 2100 is an RTS with a “neoclassic” appeal (something that would have felt like “the future of RTS” back when you played Command&Conquer).

Battle of Wesnoth is a hex-grid strategy games with loads of mods and campaigns.