Yeah, sure, just as easily as people switched from saying “Twitter” to saying “X”

They’re hardly any more dangerous than a website. They’re predominantly just more convenient to use regularly. Should we ban internet browsing too?!

That’s just semantics though. That’s exactly what I meant. No separation of RAM and storage.

I called it RAM-less, rather than all-RAM, because we already have the concept of virtual RAM on storage. So you could have your files in a file structure and your volatile memory in a virtual RAM file. And you wouldn’t necessarily even need to load files or programs into virtual RAM if you were only reading them, you could have a strict file pointer.

So could it be plausible one day to run a RAM-less computer? If persistent memory speed matched DRAM speed, would there still be a benefit to distinguishing RAM from SSD, beyond cost?

== is a heathen with no rightful place except equality to null. All praise ===