Yes, I did. But I couldn’t get my Homeassistant to work routing through it, so I switched back to Proxy Manager…

Basically, all of those https://www.qnap.com/en/how-to/faq/article/nas-recovery-guide-for-x86-based-nas There are some older models that can only boot from the DOM, however most newer ones (especially the AMD Ryzen ones, which i personally would highly recommend) have no issue. The early TS-X77 models do not boot from NVME, but that can be overcome with some creativity :)

You could do all that, yes - but that’s not really “replacing” a Synology IMHO. The point is that you don’t really have to think about putting it all together correctly - put the drives in, install your OS of choice and that’s it.

I’ve had a look and sadly, they are not available in Europe (at least for any reasonable price).

Does this have a backplane?

Get an x86 Qnap and put Truenas Scale on it - there is no case in that form factor in existence.

Get an x86 Qnap and put Truenas Scale on it - there is no case in that form factor in existence.

Do it anyway and put an x86 OS on one of the “standard UEFI” versions. There’s no other Hardware better on the market for this - even self build isn’t going to come close, there’s simply no case with 8 hotswap slots (for example).

QNAP x86, standard uefi! Can run anything. Been running mine with Proxmox, ZFS, Runtipi and others. Easy GUI setup for everything, Runtipi is just clicking add for various things.

In my “testing” at work and private, PVE is miles ahead of xcp-ng n terms of performance. Sure, xcp-ng does it’s thing very stable, but everything else…proxmox is faster

If you want things to just work: Chromecast with Android TV, plus PiHole or Adguard to pull out of all the telemetry and advertising (except maybe Amazon Prime’s new stuff).

Also, Google at least gives you the possibility to pull out of the personalized stuff and doesn’t work much with 3rd party advertiser’s. And those they work with are being taken care of with PiHole and Adguard.

• It depends

• yes

• yes

Absolutely! And I think that’s actually what happened :)

Sure - i should have mentioned, that the system itself runs not on the ZFS but from it’s own SSD. So a “ZFS Cache in Memory Bit-Flip” should (theoretically…) not cause a hard-lock/freeze. It would probably trigger a complete garbage collection though.

And yes - that’s what was so confusing to me, no kernel panic, no log entry…nothing, just a sudden, random freeze.

It also wouldn’t cause Hard-Locks and Freezes without any errors

It probably did - but that’s not why the server crashed :)

DHCP leases work - they are also correctly registered with the Hostname, it’s just those that have a static IPv4 configured (outside the DHCP range of course) It also does work for some, but for Homeassistant and PVE for example it does not…

For what? Both DHCP and DNS are turned off on both routers 🤔 Tried turning it on, but that didn’t change anything…

Apache and OpenSSL must be enabled and OpenSSL version must be 0.96d or older.

Right. Completely proven wrong.

…some Linux machines definitely need anti-virus software. Samba or NFS servers, for instance, may store documents in undocumented, vulnerable Microsoft formats, such as Word and Excel, that contain and propagate viruses. Linux mail servers should run AV software in order to neutralize viruses before they show up in the mailboxes of Outlook and Outlook Express users.[

Which is exactly what I said. ClamAV serves a very specific purpose and that’s this one.

There are still no viruses for Linux specifically designed to break in to Linux, because it’s not possible.