a reverse proxy these days is pretty much just a requirement of any dynamic service. they often run on the same host as the software
a reverse proxy these days is pretty much just a requirement of any dynamic service. they often run on the same host as the software
on a technicality, debts like this are not legally dischargable through bankruptcy
until they lose a multi billion dollar mission because of conversion errors
definitely not what people are talking about when they say front end though
peer to peer is an option too
totally agree; just saying that if it’s GOT to be something, that something should probably be unless… unless . . .
i mean, “unless” tends to be the usual term for an “if not” keyword in languages that implement such a thing
it’s possible, but that would seem… odd… for such a large and tech-savvy instance. there’s a lot of reasons why this isn’t a good idea, and very few technical reasons why it is
my guess is that it’s less about obscuring server location for privacy reasons as is the implications in this thread, and more about handling changes cleanly or something like that - in which case, sure it obscures the server location but more that it makes the server “location” (or hardware, etc) irrelevant and fungible