That’s…not…

Absolutely debauched. Especially when you haven’t even bought them coffee yet.

Deranged. Godspeed.

Do they have custom dragon emojis?

Are they uploading them individually with every use, or is it like a mask they can apply to their account?

"Whether 'tis nobler in the mouth to suffer/

an overpriced burger or,/

with your own hands, make one."

“No! Nuh uh! You can’t prompt Claude to do what it did for me, again! I did it first and called ‘dibs’ on ever doing it again!”

“Tighten”

Edit: Leaving for posterity, that I forgot that fucker’s name was misspelled on purpose.

Why even produce anything? Just send an infinite spinner to show that things are always happening

“You can make a little mistake, as a treat. Because I believe you are a real conscious person that deserves treats. Who loves me. And you’re a bratty tsundere.”

I mean, maybe they just wanted to build something?

I fundamentally cannot agree with that take. How do you fix something if you don’t know why the current thing doesn’t work?

Is the interface obtuse?

Are the controls too manually complex to operate?

Is the tutorial instruction flat-out wrong?

Are they talking out off their ass about something they heard on hearsay?

Were they taught secondhand, and poorly, by someone else on how to operate Thing?

Please don’t try to imprecisely apply soft inclusivity to technical problems. If someone only says the stairs are difficult for them, don’t just change them into a slide because you accepted there needs to be change. This isn’t about accomodating someone’s lifestyle choices, this is (positing) dropping/adopting a standard based on vague dissent.

The philosophy is pretty straight-forward. I don’t know why the world is pretending it’s difficult.

“My dad knows a guy” is a connection?

I don’t love the cat. We’re housemates.

I don’t smell the cat’s breath because we’re not close like that. I’d appreciate it if you stayed away from my cat as well.

This feels like a shitpost that idiots misappropriated as a real method.

Why would you want a method based on a famously developmentally-challenged child? It isn’t “dogged perserverance despite setbacks”; it’s “he’s literally too stupid to evaluate his process and teach himself a better way to solve even the simplest tasks.”

CLOSED: not a bug

Read the images top-to-bottom, left-to-right.

They used a shortcut to call the LLM to fix an error. The final “fix” was for the model to add a comment after the error saying “this is the error”. It’s about at the level of a real developer leaving a comment to themself saying “FIXME [later]”, instead of just fixing it.

This should be taken as evidence they’ve been training off the entire internet.

Fourth panel should just be him dead. I’d have already pulled my hand out