![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
Esc Esc Esc :w!
Esc Esc Esc :w!
Obviously I would be using XML if I was doing evil.
The end of Labyrinth Zone… drowned so many times there.
Yeah, that’s why I shared it with OP 🙂. I’m pretty sure that between the two clauses I quoted in this thread that his licence does not meet the OSI definition.
Then maybe this clause is more appropriate:
The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.
The Open Source Definition from the OSI has the clause:
The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons.
And most people (that actually care about such things) would insist that “open source” must meet the criteria of the OSD to actually be open source.
It’s neither free software (as defined by the Free Software Foundation) or open source (as defined by the Open Source Initiative).
Highest mountains on Earth. Maybe not the best idea, since it took me a while to memorize Kangchenjunga.
That’s what I’m hoping for!
If you’d like to learn how, I recommend the book (which is also available online) Crafting Interpreters.