Occam’s razor.

Base 1 is the only universal counting system.

They are using base 1111 and base 1111111111. Instead of digits, you can represent numbers using rocks, if needed.

True enough, but it’s pretty much the same to use sed, unless you need those milliseconds of performance boost.

Definitely not the ultimate, since it’s not POSIX, but still a nice tidbit.

I was thinking sed, too, but to replicate the behaviour (and scene):

echo "HOLD THE DOOR" | sed -n '
  p
  s/E//g p
  s/L//g p
  s/TH//g p
  s/ //g p
  s/DO//g p'

Note: -n suppresses the default printing that sed does, so I could include the last p for symmetry and clarity 🙂

Or

base64 -d <<< 'dXIgbW9tCmhhaGEgZ290dGVtCg=='

Can’t remember if <<< is POSIX or not, but pretty sure it works in bash and zsh.

No wonder he has to check it twice.

I basically do the same, but in a single command and I have all my aliases (and functions) in ~/.aliases.

There are no slave branches like there are no slave recordings.

Master bedroom and master bath also have nothing to do with slavery.

Switch and restore came later because checkout was problematic.

Emacs? I don’t think this is going to work out…

I’m not saying it should not be tested, I’m saying Ubuntu should not be testing it.

They really should not be testing it at all. It’s not even feature complete, let alone mature.

git reflog

Meanwhile on Linux: /boot successfully deleted

If I have a container with an isolated kernel, is it just a VM?

Live and let die?

What, with all those non-Linux users asking questions and all.

Glad I’m not the only one that thinks like this.