![](https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/dca3d5f8-83c8-4c73-b903-d06b5f653f58.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/1be75b15-2f18-429d-acf7-dcea8e512a4b.png)
The open source initiative defines what open source means and states it can’t discriminate against any person group or field of endeavor which I read as if it restricts who uses it, it isn’t open source
The open source initiative defines what open source means and states it can’t discriminate against any person group or field of endeavor which I read as if it restricts who uses it, it isn’t open source
The open source initiative defines what open source means and states it can’t discriminate against any person group or field of endeavor which I read as if it restricts who uses it, it isn’t open source
Since the license restricts who can use the software it isn’t oss
Matrix using element for the client and element call or jitsi should do the trick
Brave has a crypto token and that turns Alot of people off of brave. They also heavily encourage people to use custodial exchanges which turns some crypto people. They have also have added their affiliate links on cert pages when users would visit and they had nasty bug in their sync which mixed up user data. Otherwise Brave removes Alot of the bad parts of chrome and brave search is pretty solid. The privacy alternative is Firefox or librewolf. If you need chromium for whatever reason brave or ungoogled chromium
There are already licenses like this. Namely the sspl and the bsl. Id argue they drive away more contribution than they protect devs. Especially sspl because it’s not clear if I have to open my entire automation repo if I give a 3rd part contractor access to a web app. Also they are not open source since they restrict who can use it
My wife bought a Lenovo yoga and loves it
deleted by creator