Well, Babe❤️❤️ specifically said they guessed 3 of the 💍’s, so…

I think I should start checking if a poster has a history of regularly deleting posts/comments, before trying to give a useful answer.

For some reason, I read that as “15kg ring”.

Although, she might have meant 5k rings. 3 of them. 1 for her, 1 for him and 1 for whomsoever they are going to adulterate with.

Yeah, that’s right.

But are enough of the AI generation people going to understand the difference?
I feel like, due to the reduction of quality expectations, they will just end up feeling the same about this as we do about the previous one, despite the difference being visible as night and day for us.

Hey, 5 years ago, they couldn’t even solve a HackerRank preliminary coding challenge.

The only problem I see with AI CEOs is that the biggest models will be available to those that already have loads of money, so the adversarial investors get to win.

What’s the problem with the Anthropic one?
Of course everyone wants more W cubes! No?

But hey, at least when you tell them their mistake, they say, “You are absolutely correct!!”

Should have checked the blame before running clang-format himself.

Yeah, I am the same.
I type the code myself, so I know what it actually means, instead of letting AI do it.

It might seem different now, but 10-20 years down the line, they might be the same energy.

AI CEOs might end up doing better, you know?
At least better than the type of human CEOs that decide to go full AI.

I recently saw a picture of a SCSI connector when looking for PCIe - SATA cards.

Apparently most normal PCIe - SATA cards are very unreliable (somehow even worse than USB to SATA adapters), so I went on looking for the SCSI ones that have been reviewed as more reliable.

P.S. If anyone knows about a (non-RAID) PCIe - SATA card that I can rely upon as much as my motherboard SATA controller, then do tell.

+1 for using “You’re”

Aren’t you just providing them with free pseudo-random data, while reducing the randomness of your own system?

It is very possible that all store camera apps get an update from Google/Apple etc that bricks the phone or temporarily suspends functionality (also preventing phone locking) on glancing a specific QR code that will be given to all ICE operatives to wear somewhere on their uniform.

approximately 40 cm

Hmm, how approximate?

That’s not the probability they are looking for.

Also feel free to make an article here, if you have the time

Now just need to add this as a Kernel module and ship the binary as the default for a distro.

Their basis seems to not be corporate actions, but the usability of software.
They would probably have been happy with Windows 7.

I would want to assume onlinepersona was joking, but maybe not.

BTW, in this case, being non-professional is referring to OOP telling the truth about his feelings.