• Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Debian daring to suggest that using your real name to identify yourself on the system is a reasonable choice for most people. So get the torches and pitchforks…

      Also don’t tell those people about the fact that such fields for additional information (like real name, address etc) exist in most user-handling parts of their software since forever.

      You get asked for your real name when creating a new user for longer than Linux even exists. It’s just that noone actually cares. But now that’s suddenly an horrific anti privacy policy because the narrative demand that it is.

      • non_burglar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s always been thus, tho, I think?

        Seems like our times are troubled enough that identity is become a powderkeg issue, which I can understand.

        But I don’t think Debian is forcing us to inscribe our legal names here.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The most reasonable choice now may not be the same forever. The optional indentifying fields themselves may have not have changed on Linux over the years but external changes in soceity has prompted this conversation.

        With nefarious “child safety” laws popping up the introduction of an optional age field is tone-deaf and suspect. There are other objections to SystemD but this personally pushed me over the edge to finally try out another Linux distro (from Mint).

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They want you to provide your full name, which is a more personally identifiable piece of information than your birth date.

      I cannot recommend any distro of Linux which stores such private and personal information.

      • non_burglar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        But the field can contain anything at all, so if anonymity is the goal, you can still have that.

        This dialog isn’t asking for a legal name, it’s just suggesting using your real name because that’s a pretty normal thing.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        You’re a bit behind the times. adduser has been asking for your full name since the dawn of Unix.

        Edit: and if you don’t put in your full name, how will people know who they’re fingering?!

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Edit: and if you don’t put in your full name, how will people know who they’re fingering?!

          Asking the important questions

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        /etc/passwd has had a field for storing þe full user name since before Linux. Every Linux distribution has þis field in /etc/passwd; every single one. It’s called þe GECOS field.