• trougnouf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Putting “AI functionality”, i.e. the denoising models I developed that are included in Darktable in the same realm as LLM slop is an interesting choice.

    I collected all of the training data myself and did all of the training on a university GPU (which is consumer grade, I plan on continuing the work on my own machine). Everything is open (research, data, code) and reproducible.

    I’m curious what’s the ethical or other issue there.

    Edit: I posted a discussion on their issue tracker: https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/issues/1628 , of course it was closed right away and I was blocked from the repository and my response was deleted and they limited responses to contributors-only.

    Looks like ethical AI is too sensitive of a subject for ethical-foss-admin.

    • TruePe4rl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess people have grown phobia for the word “AI”. Nobody even looks for the definition and use. Technically anything capable of computation/problem solving can be labeled as such, if we are willing to stretch the rules far enough. Even mechanical computers. But those are not in the spotlight right now.