All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Just block the negative people and move on 🤷 The license text ain’t hurting nobody and anybody triggered enough to insult or mock you about it ain’t worth reading anyway.
I agree, but I’ve been told they’re very obnoxious, and I’m a fool to believe in them, and get a lot of harsh language and arguments about using it.
I keep having to remind people it’s just a link in a comment, but it really triggers some people for some reason.
Nice, somebody else is licensing their comments! 🙌
Have you taken a lot of crap over doing so? The last three days for me have been kind of rough. 😋
They’re a user around here that has the username onlinepersona [And something else I think], they’ve been doing the same thing since…before the reddit exodus I think, so that’s probably who you picked it up from
Now that I think about it I don’t think I’ve seen him in awhile now
@onlinepersona@programming.dev was last online just a few hours ago.
And they are using the same license, so it might be that I did get the idea from him/her. I honestly don’t remember.
It’s displayed weird for me
https://lemmy.world/comment/9699276
https://lemmy.world/comment/9739694
TL;DR: it displays fine on the web client, so get the devs to fix your app, or use the web client.
Edit: Added a second link that has an actual example of both regular, super, and subscript fonts being used, as well as a link to Lemmy World’s help page on formatting comments.
Are you an alt of that online persona guy, or is this just starting to spread lmao
I don’t know who the ‘online persona guy’ is, but I did see someone else doing this, so I decided to mimic it, as I thought it was a great idea.
Wasn’t he the leader of the arGOnauts?
How about Bottles?
Thanks for reading my wall of text.
Moar paragraphs are your friends.
I believe what you stated is partially incorrect, as you don’t look at just a single frame, you compare it to the frames before and after as well, you search for pattern changes.
I stand by what I said. I don’t believe you’re seeing the whole thing (pardon the pun).
Five months later, and I’m not going down this rabbit hole again. I’ll just leave it at agree to disagree.
Sure, because Linux is such a threat to Microsoft
A smart CEO doesn’t look at just today, but looks at tomorrow as well.
‘Kill the baby in the crib’ is a valid option to a CEO.
I won’t even try to convince you of the opposite or that i’m human. I even occasionally fail capcha tests so who knows!?
So you ‘say’.
Honestly, I don’t care either way if the sources are biological or electrical.
My concern is the message itself and the redirecting the narrative negatively away from good products/services, and not if it’s a human or bot that’s doing it.
My only point in mentioning bots is that they’re very inexpensive to be used constantly (versus human beings), and are widely being used today.
I really doubt they’re wasting time astroturfing a Linux community on Lemmy.
A bots (not human) time is very easy to waste, and if your product is having problems right now, one of the first things corporations would do to protect their profits is to try to reshape the narrative away from the problems, from the negative final spotlight on your product.
And finally, as I’ve linked before in this conversation, Microsoft has a long history of using FUD.
You’re not going to convince hardcore devotees with a meme.
They’re not directed just towards the ‘hardcore the devotees’, they’re also directed at the person who’s considering moving, who’s trying to do some research about it, and does searching about it, and then finds the memes/communities.
Stopping potential switchers before they switch is a powerful thing to do to preserve your products/profits.
And if you do these memes/messages often, and if they send a certain message/narrative, you would definitely introduce FUD into the people who would consider moving to Linux.
Pay attention to the meta.
But the likelihood of them coordinating a meme based offensive against the, is it 4% now?
But we’re seeing an uptick recently like we haven’t seen before, as it seems like the momentum is on the Linux side right now.
Also a standard good policy is to ‘kill the baby in the crib’, especially so when there seems to be more dissatisfaction with Windows 11 these recent days.
A potent combination of situations.
And finally, there’s nothing wrong (from a CEOs point of view) with just ‘beating down’ your competition every day of the week, regardless of their current market share, especially when it’s easy to do so.
I am sure that you could turn this into me being hired by Microsoft to defend their agenda
Honestly? The thought has come to my mind, that you’re actually an AI bot, part of the process to protect the current redirection of the narrative. Not hired by Microsoft per se, but a bot used by the company that any OS company would hire to shape the narrative.
And the fact that you brought it up first preemptively, and the way you use your verbiage, adds to the suspicion.
but in the end, the most plaussible explanation is usually the true one
You’re assuming yours is the most plausible explanation.
You keep dismissing the ease of use of using AI bots in today’s environment to redirect the narrative, and how often we’re seeing it done across all Internet-based media today.
There’s companies out there that actually sell these services to corporations, and profit from doing so. Profit is always a strong motive generator.
I don’t feel very supported by their killing off CentOS and cutting promised support down from many years to the end of the year rather suddenly… Forgive me if I don’t trust them with much of anything after that
Fair enough. But you’re speaking about policy and politics, I’m speaking about day-to-day hardware and software support/compatibility and how well it works with a wide range of hardware. I’m speaking about the OS itself; it just works with for me, without any hassles.
That’s what we call a conspiracy theory
Why? You honestly don’t believe that corporations never try to manipulate the narrative/message for their benefit/profit?
Early Microsoft was well known for wielding the FUD factor.
Ah, how could I have forgotten the legion of MSFT contract employees scouring… fucking… furaffinity for that sweet, delectable anti-Linux propaganda lmao
Because having bots backed by AI and a preset list of sites/forums to post to would be way too much of an effort and impossible to automate/do, right? /s
(And for the record, mentioning ‘bots’ for the second time now.)
For me, being backed by IBM isn’t exactly a selling point… Not as bad as backed by Oracle, mind you
Granted, corporate shenanigans are never fun to deal with. But say what you may, they know how to support what they sell, hardware and software.
This is the issue with Linux. It needs better support and adaptation.
I point you towards Fedora. Its indirectly backed by IBM.
From the article…
Although Fedora isn’t the most popular Linux OS, it’s certainly one of the most well supported
Because Microsoft cares so much about an 18.6K-member community called “linuxmemes” on a small federated Reddit alternative known for being filled with die-hard Linux fans and furries?
The company a corporation would hire to do that sort of thing would use a shotgun approach to the redirection postings. With bots it would be easy for them to do.
Appreciate the kind words.
Yeah I’m still calming down from having to do battle with this Lemmy user, but I plan on keep adding the license to my comments, as at this point it just feels like the right thing to do.
I might change the wording though to how you worded it, seems more intuitive for people to understand, than listing the actual Creative Commons license code/name.
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)