The update got released over 2 months ago. So sensible admins should not be getting hit by this.

Also I use Jellyfin btw.

  • RxBrad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My Plex is updated, and hiding behind a random-long-text-string wildcarded subdomain that (so far) has not been discovered.

    My Crowdsec intercepted 5X the normal number of hacking attempts & port scans on October 17th… no doubt from dirtbags trying to exploit this.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Someone please educate me, in case I’m missing something. Is there an excuse left why people use plex, not jellyfin? It’s now basically on every platform and even supports music and audiobooks.

    • anewfox@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      it becomes easier to understand when you look outside of your bubble for, like, a second.

      if you want to try explaining to my eldery mother that lives 3000 miles away how to setup wireguard so she can access my jellyfin server on her smart tv, be my guest. oh you’ll just do it remotely? ok, explain to her how to install and setup vnc and forward the right ports so you can remote in, oh but she doesn’t want to watch on her laptop, she wants it on her tv. can’t vnc into that.

      or you can say “install the plex app and i emailed you your login details.”

      i’m a jellyfin user, but that’s why people continue to use plex.

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I’m having a hard time understanding why you need all of that to just log into your jellyfin when you’re not home! You don’t need wireguard, or VNC or any of that jargon. That is something you chose to do for some reason. I can do it with literally the same way you said it

        “install the plex app and i emailed you your login details.”

        Replace plex with jellyfin. Your mother won’t need to do anything but downloading the app and put in the credentials and the server address which is in your face once you launched the app. Get a domain from cloudflare for $10 a year and set it up on the server. That’s it. No need for wireguard. I did the same thing for my friend who uses my jellyfin. I only sent him username and password and server address. That’s it.

    • bwrsandman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have Plex and Jellyfin but if I want to watch on my PS5, Plex has an official media app on there that’s really convenient to use.

    • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Some paid for lifetime and enjoy it. Or prefer the layout. Or prefer the easier sharing if data with family and friends.

      There are still reasons to run Plex over Jellyfin for some, but not many of they keep going the way they are.

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Understandable, but like I told the other person in another comment. Setting jellyfin on a friend’s device is as easy as setting up plex if you get a domain name. I have one from cloudflare that I pay $10 a month for. I create the user account on my end and only give my friend the server address and login

        • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Sure, but I’ll use myself as an example: I don’t want any of my services exposed to the internet, so Tailscale/Netbird/other Wireguard solution is the best choice.
          Some family members have their TV’s online with no Tailscale or media box, so that solution is out.

          Sure I could route all their Jellyfin traffic to my me via an exit node or VPN, but then we’re way deeper into this than my 60-something mother would ever want to. And I am on the hook for both her and my uptime. So phone/tablet/PC only if they don’t want a streaming device with native support.

          The built in functionality on Plex is really practical, and practical is good for us creatures of comfort.

          So I’m not disagreeing with you, just explaining what edge Plex still has over JF.

          (And yes, I could do what you do and run with Cloudflare, but I don’t want to pay for it and I don’t want any traffic via third party I don’t trust)

    • tko@tkohhh.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Because Plexamp is by far the best music player I’ve ever used.

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s fair. I don’t use it, so I don’t know what I’m missing. Navidrome has been fantastic. And it has great frontends on both IOS and Android. I’ve personally built my own frontend that I’ve been using for the better part of a year.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because Jellyfin is an ugly, duct-taped-together mess. It’s very utilitarian at best, when everything is working. Ease of use is just not there for your non-technical friends and family.

      Invariably whenever you bring any of these issues up, people will come out of the woodwork and tell you “Oh you just have to bolt this thing on or use it in this one specific unintended way in order to get it working halfway towards what you want”.

      • lokalhorst@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Not that I want to disagree with you, and I have never used Plex. But I was shocked how polished and easy Jellyfin is for an open source project when I used it the first time. It feels like a very mature piece of software to me. My gf really loves it, too.

        I agree setting up tailscale for remote access was a bit of a learning curve though.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          51 minutes ago

          If you think there’s anything polished about Jellyfin there’s a whole world of open source projects out there for you to discover. The world is your oyster.

          It definitely isn’t mature by any measure. It’s been stuck in the process of fixing technical debt and poor design decisions from the project it was forked from for years now and still isn’t finished, though they’ve made some progress in the last couple years. But I’m not sure if they are going to keep the momentum up since several lead maintainers have left the project recently. Jellyfin still hasn’t figured out table stakes features like native intro and credit skipping, OIDC support, etc. There are some devastating bugs that having been around more most of its lifetime too. One they fixed like a month ago was if Jellyfin couldn’t access your media files for even a short period of time, it would delete all media from your playlists and you’d have to recreate them one one.

          • lokalhorst@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            I don’t think that is how it works. I don’t necessarily need a reference to tell something is a good or a bad product. I have never said that Jellyfin is more polished than Plex is, just that my impreession is contadictionary to yours of Jellyfin being a duct-taped mess. No idea why you would argue against another persons obviously subjective opinion?

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              43 minutes ago

              I’m not saying you don’t think it’s polished, I’m saying that if Jellyfin is where you set the bar for what “polished” means to you, then the rest of the open source world is going to blow your mind. Like you have nowhere to go but up from here.

              Jellyfin being a duct taped mess on the other hand isn’t part of any subjective opinion, that’s just the state the software is in. Like it’s just missing basic features of its competitors, and has been stuck in relative development hell trying to rework the internals it inherited from Emby.

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s subjective. I’ve never had an issue with it, neither has my wife or son or the couple of friends who use my media.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I wouldn’t call it subjective. The issues that it has are all objectively there, whether or not you’re bothered by them is what’s subjective. If you’re personally ok with all the quirks, bugs, missing features and general lack of polish that plague Jellyfin but not Plex more power to you. But those problems exist regardless, and they are the answer to the question you asked.

        • tko@tkohhh.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Of course it’s subjective, but it was you who asked why people continue to use Plex. This is a reason, and the reason is valid whether you share the same experience or not.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m waiting to see the elusive Arch, Jellyfin Vegan stack in the wild. We know they exist and they are fucking telling everyone

    • moodwrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Everyone talks about Jellyfin, but I just switched to Emby and I couldn’t be happier (no connect cloud stuff). Can someone please let me know why and how I just made the worst decision of my life please.

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Jellyfin is a fork of Emby before they closed the code, so most likely everything you have on Emby you would have on Jellyfin but without the worry that tomorrow Emby will pull a Plex onto you. Up until a while ago they were so alike that you could use Emby client on a Jellyfin server, not sure if that’s still possible though.

      • pory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The main reason is that if you switch from Plex to Emby you’re going from paid licenseware (fully enshittified) to paid licenseware (not fully enshittified yet). It’s like when everyone finally dropped Skype and moved to… Discord. Which hey it’s closed source and owned by venture capital, but it doesn’t suck yet!!! And now in 2026, Discord is what Discord is.

        • moodwrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          But I haven’t paid anything to Emby (I don’t need the code behind that key) and without cloud, I could continue using this version forever and they can’t enshitify it

          • techwithjake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Until they make a code change that forces a key to stream to an app or run at all. Jellyfin is actually a fork of the original Emby code before they closed sourced it and started down the bad path.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      IDK why everyone here is in love with Jellyfin when we have Stremio/Nuvio. Jellyfin is a lot of work; with Nuvio all you do is browse like Netflix, and stream. No existing media library required.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Ah yes, the better option is to… use a streaming service that works by downloading random bittorrents in a completely opaque manner you have little to no control over.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          You’re misrepresenting how it works. There is nothing “random” or “opaque” about Nuvio. You pick and choose the exact file you want to see, just like browsing torrents. I go with the REMUX every time.

          And It’s better because you can watch anything you want instantly without having to download it first then transfer it to your Jellyfin library, and then delete the file when you’re done watching. Nuvio simplifies the entire process. (Of course you can also save your download to your library to watch again).

          You people frustrate me so much; you rather make up lies than simply try the app and see for yourself how much better it is than Jellyfin. Nuvio can do everything Jellyfin does, except better.

        • anewfox@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          my jellyfin server continues to work if my internet is down. the choice is simple.

      • curbstickle_lw@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Because a lot of us watch things that cant be found easily, or home movies, or prefer to have it readily available at any time.

        There are many reasons. Dont assume your use case is the only one.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I’m stoked on my Jellyfin setup, but I’ll check on Stremio again in case I want to recommend it to anyone. Never heard of Nuvio, but at a glance it seems like you have to connect it to a media library.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Nuvio is the same as Stremio except better, because it has more quality of life features (like a “Who’s watching” feature). I only mentioned Stremio because it’s more well-known than Nuvio, but both work the same way. If anyone remembers Popcorn Time, it’s kinda like that.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Yeah I loved popcorn time. I’m looking into Stremio, and I’m already down a rabbit-hole of add-ons, debrid providers, and reading between the lines. Doesn’t seem like anything I can recommend to nontechnical folks.

            • Psythik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Well like I said, please look into Nuvio instead. I’m about to ditch Stremio and switch

  • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure explains why Plex was so cagey and uninformative when they emailed everyone to update their servers a couple months back. Not so much as a CVE report or change set.

    A vulnerability? No…. 4 of them. And they stack.

    • Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      That kind of is the proper way to handle this. You don’t want to hint bad actors where to look and give people some time to update.

  • The Zen Cow Says Mu@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If you want to expose plex to the open Internet (not a VPN) Don’t open the plex port to the internet. Turn off the “remote access” setting and run it behind a reverse proxy instead.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      And if you run a reverse proxy, put crowdsec on it. The free options for filters are pretty well maintained.

  • Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Hackers still doing cryptominers nowadays? C’mon, get with the times, install a LLM model on people’s computers instead.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Running your own crypto miners doesn’t make sense anymore because the cost of electricity. Running a crypto miner using someone else’s electricity on the other hand…

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    i run mine through wireguard, but also think i do have its port open to the wider web using the plex signon they push. i’m prob fucked huh?

    pfft. turned off remote access and the port forward. checked svr for exploit. updated plex. updated wireguard while at it. dont need remote access anyway.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    As someone who has nearly all internet facing software auto update with watchtower nightly my cortisol is so low

  • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I got all worried and updated (I basically never do) and then went to put in my password to log back in and then go searching for payload files and whatever, and wouldn’t you know it I was smart as shit and made the password tell me in no uncertain terms that I changed it for exactly that problem! Could stop worrying!

    I did it because I was annoyed at having to do it I’m sure, but man it turns out that was a great idea!

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 minutes ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    CSAM Child Sexual Abuse Material
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    ISP Internet Service Provider
    LXC Linux Containers
    Plex Brand of media server package
    SMB Server Message Block protocol for file and printer sharing; Windows-native
    UDP User Datagram Protocol, for real-time communications
    VNC Virtual Network Computing for remote desktop access
    VPN Virtual Private Network
    nginx Popular HTTP server

    [Thread #141 for this comm, first seen 19th Oct 2026, 23:00] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Am not sensible admin. Though I did just run a backup and update. How likely am I FUBAR?

    Edit: I run Plex on a dedicated proxmox VM. Theoretically I could nuke it and start over with my Plex database file. Though there’s some config I’d have to do again and I don’t want to

    • bretton.dev@coves.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was also impacted, you need to remove the payload that got dumped:

      Payload: /tmp/.pxb/{curl,wget}, /tmp/.spid

      Two processes named khungtaskd / cron

      They also stole your admin token so go to the Plex UI and log out of all devices for whichever account has ownership of the instance.

      Then you can reclaim ownership and it resets the admin token.

      You should likely be fine, I didn’t have any crypto miners on mine, it was just in a docker instance and didn’t have access outside of it. I would be much more worried if it was a direct install on a main PC.

      Also install watch tower

      • Gwaer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I run plex on proxmox. When I woke up I noticed my proxmox server was using a lot more cpu than usual.

        Then, plex was using all the resources it was provisioned for. So I checked out what was running and it was a weird process. I tracked down some logs and found the intrusion. IPs related to it etc. but I just blew up the lxc. Saved a copy of the malicious programs and the logs to dig into. Spun up a new plex from the previous days backup.

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Stop with the passive aggressive “btw,” please. It was used by gloating Arch users, and it’s not a great look.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Also I use Jellyfin btw.

    You shouldn’t be talking with the amount of hilarious CVEs jellyfin has also had lmao

    EDIT:

    Literally a critical RCE a couple of months ago lol: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-35031

    Your downvotes are meaningless, please don’t run Jellyfin publicly exposed without at least some form of secondary ACL whether it be a full blown VPN or just a lazy reverse proxy login like authentik.

    And please run inside a non privliged container. Either use uidmap or go rootless.

    I’m pretty sure there are multiple hackthebox machines based around jellyfin because of how notorious it used to be with bugs.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m guessing this requires it be exposed to the Internet. Please stop exposing services to the Internet.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Kind of defeats the purpose of Plex and Jellyfin.

      • peppericecream@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        *defeats your purpose of Plex and Jellyfin

        I just want a media server. I have no use case to make it available to the public internet.

        • baddu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And who the fuck are you to speak for me? Some of us actually leave the basement.

      • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only reason to expose it raw to the internet is because your hosting a piracy service.

        You can easily keep everything inside of a wireguard VPN and expose nothing directly.

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s pretty much the number one reason people say they won’t move to Jellyfin - the ease of public access.

      Even though exposing your shit to Internet is a terrible idea for most people.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think people over blow how dangerous it is. Or maybe its better most people dont. I don’t know I know the issues and I take measures to mitigate them. Then if someone gets in they would be limited to vlan. And if somebody gets out of that good wasted so much effort for nothing since I have nothing that would be worth that much trouble.

        And before someone says identity pretty sire that has been in so many other leaks overt the years the information is pretty old.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Even without data compromise or pivoting, they can still mine crypto on your hardware, launch a ddos, spam email, do botnet stuff, or host CSAM.

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Not if your Jellyfin is set up correctly.

            Read-only, rootless container with only the cache/transcode/config folders mounted RW+noexec - ideally both with a volume size limit.

            Reverse proxy only the absolutely minimal ports needed, with some security measures (e.g. crowdsec transparent proxy, hooked up to both your firewall and reverse proxy to block malicious actors.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              The start of this thread is “number one reason people don’t move to Jellyfin is ease of remote access.”

              30 years ago I was compiling slackware and configuring dns servers, and setting up BGP on Ciscos. But a few hours of attempting to setup Jellyfin was a failure. It was far more complex than setting up dns/bind.

              • fonix232@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                It’s literally just:

                • create docker container
                • forward FOUR ports: 8096, 8920, 7359(udp) for discovery, and 1900(UDP) for DLNA to local network
                • forward a SINGLE port via reverse proxy: 8096 if your proxy handles HTTPS, 8920 if you want Jellyfin to handle HTTPS

                I highly doubt that if somehow you were setting up BGPs at Cisco, this incredibly straightforward port setup somehow got the best of you.

                • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Not at Cisco. With a Cisco. I ran a mid sized ISP in the 90’s until I was bought out by a cable company and retired. Although several of my employees went on to work at Cisco. I also had a few friends who were executives at Cisco because we all started at a company working for Vint Cerf and Bob Khan (they were the angel investors) back before most knew of the Internet.

                  First it’s a VM because I’m not going mess around with stuff on bare metal. Create docker is a can of worms because you have to pick a reverse proxy software like nginx, traefik, caddy. Which means you need to understand all three to know which to pick. Then there’s setting up the certificate with the dns provider. So I got nginx working with a certificate but gave up after the VM running Jellyfin couldn’t see it. Googling showed someone on Reddit with the same problem but no answer other than others saying “works for me”

              • fonix232@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Beside, that wasn’t even the topic. We were discussing - or rather, I was proving to the above commenter - that setting up Jellyfin in a way that does not allow an intruder to crypto mine or host CSAM or use your device as a proxy, is incredibly easy.

                Port setup and it’s perceived impossibility by you has naught to do with that topic.

      • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Just throw a wireguard tunnel on your router and call it a day.

        If ya gotta host public put a dedicated proxmox host on its own port on your router, make it a trunk line, and give every VM its own subnet/VLAN/Firewall ruleset.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s fine for your personal remote access but that doesn’t help your 80 year old mother in law watch videos of the grandchildren on a Roku.

          • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Been thinking of throwing together a set top box with everything made up for my grandfather so he can stream stuff from my jellyfin setup.

            I just need to find an ezpz enough to use frontend.

          • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Slap a vpn on her computer or but a shitty dell from good will. Point the Roku at that and forward the traffic…?

            Like this is a solvable setup and forget about it for the next 5 years. Sort of set up.

        • lama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          WG works for us, but isn’t scalable once it comes to sharing. It would provide too much friction for a lot of people

          • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s really not. If people are too lazy to install one VPN app and import the tunnel config, then they can pay for paid streaming instead.

          • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I manage it with netbird.

            Just have em install netbird, if it’s on they can connect to my website. If it’s off they can’t.

            It’s literally three steps for each person, there’s ways to make this easy. It just requires the host to put in the leg work