I’m using shenanigans now, fits the best methinks.
What about
joe? Because the engineer who bootstrapped the project mistakenly put his name as the mainline branch and we realized it far too late during the lifecycle and the team decided to keep the branch name because it’s hilarious.Joe who?
Joe mama
deleted by creator
Branch on every commit. Never delete. If something needs to be rolled back, merge it back into HEAD. Conflict resolution only through melee combat.
Never merge. Only cherry pick.
You have met every team I have ever worked with apparently
How have you survived in this world without exploding into a million little fiery merge conflicts?
I let the interns handle those. If they survive, they get bragging rights.
Conflict resolution only through melee combat.
Wrestle with Jeff, Prepare for death.
HEAD
It’s master3. Don’t question it!
prod
I like prod because it makes less assumptions on stability. It is what is being used, good luck with the rest.
Stick with the prod, its always a good idea to prod with the prod, stick with the prod.
hunter2
Why would you name a branch just 7 asterisks?
Developshould be Chaotic Evil.This is what is used where I work. I have never and will never understand why.
At some point in the past that was the only way to make the business run immediately when the boss said it needed to run immediately, and it’s been that way ever since
Boring answer: older repos are master, newer ones are main. I’ve worked at companies that did other things such as having the prod branch be a branch called prod.
Chaotic Evil should be the current sha hash.
“live” didn’t make it onto the list, I see.
Looks like it died.
Live and let die?
It’s dead, Jim.
Yall have multiple branches?
Feel like lawful evil fits better for master
“Untitled”
Untitled-project2_final_fixed-3.zip
(empty string)
branch (i always commit directly to the main branch so i only have one, so why bother naming it. also YOU CANT STOP ME FROM DOING IT BWAHAHAHAHAHA)
