• kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    The manufacturer is labeling the drive correctly as 1TB (1000GB, 10^(12)B). It’s Microsoft that incorrectly labels it as 931GB; it’s actually 931GiB (931 * 2^(30)B). A Mac will correctly show 1000GB and a Linux machine will correctly show 931GiB.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’ve seen GB sometimes on Linux, but they’re actual GB, not mislabeled GiB, so I don’t have a problem with it.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        “Bootlickers will blame a multi-trillion-dollar company”

        Do you know what that word means?

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          If any company could get away with labelling their product to have 1/10th less and get away with it, they would. Usually consumer rights organisations fight to make it so that you get what is advertised.

          The producers are using semantics to give less. I, as a customer want what I have been promised by the label.

          If you’re interested in arguing the opposite, you’re anti-customer, and pro-ripoff.

          • TheNamlessGuy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            “I don’t understand SI measurements but daddy Gates told me all the others are wrong and he’s the only one who cares for me”

            • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              fastfetch output :

              Disk (/): 203.45 GiB / 224.94 GiB (90%) - ext4
              Disk (/media/skullgrid/Data): 684.44 GiB / 913.43 GiB (75%) - fuseblk
              

              I didn’t realise that Linus Torvalds changed his name…

              … unless you think I specifically went out and bought a laptop that advertised a 913.43 GiB secondary drive?

              • TheNamlessGuy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                This just proves my point further. Let me break the timeline down for you:

                1. Computers are good at the power of 2, so we start using the number 1024 (2^10), and call it a “Megabyte” because it’s “close enough”
                2. Someone points out that this technically is fraud
                3. Instead of rectifying this, people invent an entirely new, entirely arbitrary range of measurements that don’t follow the SI standard - the mibibyte family
                4. Hardware manufacturers take advantage of this discrepancy to make their products look better
                5. OS devs stick to their guns, presumably only to avoid an outlash of “where did my storage go” from users

                TL;DR: The “mibibye” family of measurements are an abomination

              • ulterno@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                Now I understand why the 100 IQ guy up there is crying.
                Because even after you see the literal ‘i’ in between, you will still call them the same.

                It’s as if you bought a metric ton of grain just to then complain that is doesn’t match an imperial tonne.